Facts of the Case
The appeal was filed by the Revenue (Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax–5) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act before the Delhi High
Court against Kronos Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
During the hearing, counsel for the Revenue submitted that
the tax effect involved in the appeal was below ₹50 lakhs, which falls
below the monetary threshold prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated
11.07.2018.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the High Court should adjudicate the substantial question of law when the
tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit?
- Applicability
of CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 to pending appeals.
Petitioner’s (Revenue) Arguments
- The
Revenue initially filed the appeal raising substantial questions of law.
- However,
it was conceded that the tax effect in the present case is below ₹50
lakhs, making the appeal not maintainable in light of the CBDT
circular.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The
respondent relied on the CBDT Circular prescribing monetary limits for
filing appeals.
- It was implied that the appeal should not be entertained due to low tax effect.
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
Delhi High Court noted that the tax effect is below ₹50 lakhs,
which is the threshold limit as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
- Accordingly,
the Court held that:
- The
substantial question of law need not be answered.
- The
appeal is disposed of without adjudicating the merits, leaving the
question of law open.
Important Clarification
- The
dismissal of the appeal is not on merits, but purely on account of low
tax effect.
- The
substantial questions of law remain open and can be considered in
appropriate cases where the tax effect exceeds the prescribed limit.
Sections Involved
- Section
260A – Appeal to High Court (Income Tax Act, 1961)
- CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 – Monetary limits for filing appeals
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2018:DHC:8314-DB/SKN30072018ITA4952018_152124.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment