Facts of the Case
The
assessee, Chunakhali Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samiti Limited, is a primary
agricultural cooperative society registered under the West Bengal Cooperative
Societies Act. It filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring
Nil income after claiming deduction of ₹26,11,197 under Section 80LA. The case
was selected for limited scrutiny to verify low income vis-à-vis high
investments reflected in the balance sheet. During assessment proceedings, the
assessee did not respond to statutory notices. The Assessing Officer completed
assessment under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B), making
an addition of ₹2,83,00,000 as unexplained investment under Section 69B read
with Section 115BBE and disallowing the deduction claimed under Section 80LA.
On
appeal, the CIT(A) deleted the addition under Section 69B and allowed deduction
under Section 80LA, while denying deduction under Sections 80P(2)(a) and
80P(2)(d). Aggrieved, the Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal with a
delay of 503 days, which was condoned.
Issues Involved
Whether
the CIT(A) was justified in admitting additional evidence without recording
reasons and without allowing the Assessing Officer an opportunity to examine
the evidence as required under Rule 46A, whether deletion of addition under
Section 69B without examining the source of investment was sustainable, and
whether the appellate order suffered from lack of application of mind.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The
Revenue contended that the assessee failed to explain the source of substantial
increase in long-term investments during assessment proceedings. It was argued
that the CIT(A) accepted additional documents at the appellate stage without
calling for a remand report or granting opportunity to the Assessing Officer,
in violation of Rule 46A. It was further submitted that the order of the CIT(A)
was cryptic and merely stated that the explanation was acceptable without
proper examination of the source of investment.
Respondent’s Arguments
The
assessee submitted that the CIT(A) had examined the financial statements and
other materials and had rightly granted relief after considering the facts of
the case.
Court Order / Findings
The
ITAT Kolkata held that although the powers of the CIT(A) are co-terminous with
those of the Assessing Officer, the procedure prescribed under Rule 46A must be
strictly followed when additional evidence is admitted. The Tribunal observed
that the CIT(A) failed to record reasons for admission of additional evidence
and did not provide the Assessing Officer an opportunity to examine such
evidence or furnish a remand report. It was further held that the relief was
granted in a cryptic manner without examining the source of investment.
Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the
matter to his file with directions to decide the appeal afresh after complying
with Rule 46A and after providing opportunity to both the Assessing Officer and
the assessee.
Important Clarification
The
Tribunal clarified that while the CIT(A) has wide appellate powers, admission
of additional evidence must strictly comply with Rule 46A. Any relief granted
without following the prescribed procedure and without proper examination of
facts renders the appellate order unsustainable in law.
Final Outcome
The
appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside,
and the matter was restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in
accordance with law after granting opportunity to the Assessing Officer to
examine the additional evidence and after providing reasonable opportunity of
hearing to the assessee.
Source Link- https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1767330391-JcN569-1-TO.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is
shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers
should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not
intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and
the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content.
The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment