Facts of the Case
- The
assessees are non-resident entities belonging to the GE group (including
GE Engine Service Distribution LLC, GE Engine Services Inc., etc.).
- The
dispute arose regarding levy of interest under Section 234B for
failure to pay advance tax.
- The
ITAT ruled in favour of the assessees, holding that such interest was not
leviable in the given circumstances.
- The Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging the ITAT’s decision.
Issues Involved
- Whether
interest under Section 234B is leviable on non-resident assessees.
- Whether
the ITAT was justified in following earlier High Court precedent.
- Whether pending appeals before the Supreme Court affect the binding nature of High Court judgments.
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
- The
Revenue contended that the assessees were liable to pay advance tax.
- Consequently,
failure to do so attracted interest under Section 234B.
- The Revenue sought reconsideration of the issue despite existing precedent, especially since appeals were pending before the Supreme Court.
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
- The
assessees relied on the binding precedent of the Delhi High Court in:
- Director
of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs GE Packaged Power Inc. (2015)
373 ITR 65 (Delhi).
- It
was argued that:
- The
issue of Section 234B applicability to non-residents had already been
settled in their favour.
- The ITAT correctly followed the binding precedent.
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
Delhi High Court held that:
- The
issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessees by its
earlier judgment.
- The
ITAT committed no error in following the binding precedent.
- The
Court further observed:
- Even
though the Revenue’s appeal is pending before the Supreme Court, the
existing High Court judgment continues to bind.
- Final
Order:
- All appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.
Important Clarification by Court
- The
Court clarified that:
- The
parties shall ultimately be bound by the final decision of the Supreme
Court in the pending appeals and Special Leave Petitions.
- This
ensures that:
- The
present ruling is subject to the outcome of the apex court.
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2018:DHC:8725-DB/SRB21052018ITA6052018_144505.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment