Facts of the Case
The Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court
against various GE group entities (non-resident assessees), challenging the
orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
The core issue pertained to the levy of interest under Section
234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on non-resident entities.
The ITAT had ruled in favour of the assessees by following earlier binding precedents of the Delhi High Court. Aggrieved by this, the Revenue preferred appeals before the High Court.
Issues Involved
- Whether
interest under Section 234B is leviable on non-resident assessees.
- Whether
the liability to pay advance tax arises when tax is deductible at source.
- Whether the ITAT erred in following earlier binding precedent of the Delhi High Court.
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
- The
Revenue contended that the assessees were liable to pay interest under
Section 234B for failure to pay advance tax.
- It
was argued that the ITAT wrongly relied on previous judgments without
independently analyzing the facts.
- The Revenue further submitted that the matter was pending before the Supreme Court and therefore required reconsideration.
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
- The
assessees (GE group entities) argued that they were non-residents and
their income was subject to Tax Deducted at Source (TDS).
- Since
the obligation to deduct tax lies on the payer, no liability to pay
advance tax arises for the assessee.
- Reliance
was placed on the binding precedent of the Delhi High Court in Director
of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs GE Packaged Power Inc. (2015)
373 ITR 65 (Delhi).
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
Delhi High Court held that the issue was already covered in favour of the
assessees by its earlier judgment.
- It
was observed that the ITAT correctly followed the binding precedent and
committed no error.
- The
Court reiterated that interest under Section 234B is not leviable where
tax is deductible at source on payments to non-residents.
- Accordingly,
all appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.
Important Clarification by the Court
- The
Court clarified that since the matter is pending before the Supreme Court,
the final outcome will be subject to the decision of the Supreme Court.
- The
parties shall be bound by the final ruling in the pending batch of appeals
before the Apex Court.
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2018:DHC:8725-DB/SRB21052018ITA6052018_144505.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment