Facts of the Case

The Revenue filed four appeals before the Delhi High Court against a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 6 January 2017 concerning Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05.

The dispute arose from penalties levied by the Assessing Officer under Sections 271D and 271E for alleged contraventions of Sections 269SS and 269T. The Tribunal deleted these penalties by relying upon earlier judicial precedents involving identical facts and legal questions concerning the Sahara Group.

The Revenue challenged the Tribunal’s order before the High Court seeking determination of substantial questions of law.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting penalties imposed under Section 271D?
  2. Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting penalties imposed under Section 271E?
  3. Whether any substantial question of law arose for consideration by the High Court?

Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)

  • The Revenue contended that the assessee had violated the statutory mandate under Sections 269SS and 269T.
  • It was argued that the Assessing Officer had rightly imposed penalties under Sections 271D and 271E.
  • The Revenue sought reversal of the ITAT’s order deleting such penalties.

Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)

  • The assessee relied upon earlier judicial decisions involving identical issues within the same group concerns.
  • It was argued that the Tribunal had correctly followed binding precedent.
  • The assessee maintained that no new legal issue arose warranting interference by the High Court.

Court Findings / Observations

The Delhi High Court observed that the ITAT had relied upon an earlier order of the High Court dated 20 September 2012, which had already upheld the deletion of similar penalties imposed under Sections 271D and 271E in relation to Sahara Indian Financial Corporation Ltd., a group concern.

The Court noted that the present appeals involved identical questions of fact and law. Therefore, consistency in judicial approach was necessary.

The Bench held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration in the present appeals.

 

Court Order / Final Decision

The Delhi High Court dismissed all four appeals filed by the Revenue and upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting the penalties under Sections 271D and 271E. No order as to costs was passed.

Important Clarification

This judgment reiterates that where identical issues have already been settled by precedent, the Revenue cannot repeatedly agitate the same issue unless a distinct substantial question of law arises.

It reinforces judicial consistency in matters concerning penalty under Sections 271D and 271E.

Sections Involved

  • Section 271D – Penalty for contravention of Section 269SS
  • Section 271E – Penalty for contravention of Section 269T
  • Section 269SS – Acceptance of loans/deposits otherwise than by account payee cheque/draft/electronic mode
  • Section 269T – Repayment of loans/deposits otherwise than by account payee cheque/draft/electronic mode
  • Income Tax Act, 1961

Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2017:DHC:8935-DB/SMD30082017ITA5572017_162417.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.