Facts of the Case

A search and seizure operation resulted in proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act against the respondent companies. During assessment, the Assessing Officer made additions under Section 68 treating certain credits as unexplained.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted these additions, holding that there was no incriminating material discovered during the search to justify the additions. Aggrieved by the ITAT’s order, the Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A.

 Issues Involved

  1. Whether additions under Section 68 can be made in assessments under Section 153A without incriminating material found during search?
  2. Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer?
  3. Whether any substantial question of law arose for consideration before the High Court?

 Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)

  • The Revenue argued that the ITAT erred in deleting additions made under Section 68.
  • It was contended that the Assessing Officer had validly exercised powers under Section 153A.
  • Revenue sought restoration of additions on the ground that the credits remained unexplained.

 Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)

  • The respondents argued that no incriminating material was found during the search to support the additions.
  • They relied on the principle laid down in CIT vs Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 573 (Del.).
  • It was submitted that completed assessments cannot be disturbed under Section 153A without fresh incriminating evidence.

 Court Findings / Observations

The Delhi High Court observed that the ITAT had correctly followed the principle laid down in CIT vs Kabul Chawla, which governs the scope of assessment under Section 153A.

The Court further noted that in an earlier connected matter involving the same assessee (Pr. CIT vs Best Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd., ITA 869/2017), similar additions under Section 68 had already been upheld as unsustainable in the absence of incriminating material.

The Court held that the Revenue failed to establish any substantial question of law.

 Court Order / Final Decision

The Delhi High Court dismissed all Revenue appeals and upheld the ITAT’s order deleting the additions made under Section 68 in Section 153A proceedings.

 Important Clarification

This judgment reinforces the settled legal principle that completed assessments cannot be interfered with under Section 153A unless incriminating material is found during search proceedings. Mere review or reassessment of concluded issues without fresh material is not permissible.

Sections Involved

  • Section 153A – Assessment in case of search or requisition
  • Section 68 – Unexplained cash credits
  • Section 260A – Appeal to High Court 

Link to download the order -

https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2017:DHC:8952-DB/SRB30102017ITA9002017_124955.pdf

 Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.