Facts of the
Case
The complainant, CA V. Radhakrishna Pillai, was the
statutory auditor of M/s Uniserve Distributors Private Limited for a continuous
period from Financial Year 2015–16 to 2019–20. It was alleged that the
respondent, CA Vijaya Mohan Valiathan, accepted appointment as statutory
auditor of the company for FY 2019–20 without the complainant being removed in
accordance with Section 140(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, which mandates a
special resolution for removal of an auditor before expiry of term.
It was further alleged that the respondent accepted
the audit assignment without first communicating in writing with the complainant
and completed the audit and signed the audit report even before obtaining No
Objection Certificate from the previous auditor.
Issues
Involved
Whether the respondent Chartered Accountant was
guilty of professional misconduct under Items (8) and (9) of Part I of the
First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for accepting statutory
audit without prior written communication with the outgoing auditor and for
failing to verify the legality of removal and appointment under the Companies
Act, 2013.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The complainant contended that he was validly
appointed as auditor for a five-year term commencing from 30.09.2015 and was
never removed by a special resolution as required under Section 140(1). It was
argued that the respondent accepted audit and issued consent letters in August
and September 2019 without obtaining NOC and without verifying the
complainant’s continuing appointment. The complainant further alleged that the
respondent relied on a tampered board resolution showing a shorter tenure and
failed to verify original minutes of the company.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The respondent submitted that he attempted to
deliver a communication letter personally and later sent it by speed post when
the complainant’s office was found closed. He contended that there was no
intention to bypass professional requirements and that he relied on documents
provided by the company regarding appointment and tenure of the previous
auditor. The respondent pleaded that the lapse was procedural and sought leniency.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Board of Discipline examined the documentary
evidence, timelines and submissions of both parties. The Board noted that the
respondent provided consent for appointment in August and September 2019 but
sought No Objection Certificate only on 27.11.2020, more than one year after
accepting the audit assignment. The Board further observed that the audit
report was signed on 08.12.2020, whereas the NOC was received by the
complainant only on 19.12.2020, rendering the communication ineffective and
non-compliant with Item (8).
With respect to Item (9), the Board noted
discrepancies between the complainant’s appointment resolution dated 30.09.2015
providing a five-year term and the respondent’s version indicating a three-year
term with visible signs of tampering. The Board held that the respondent had a
professional obligation to verify the original minutes book and authenticity of
the resolution before accepting the audit. Failure to do so amounted to lack of
due diligence and violation of statutory requirements under Section 139 and
Section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Important
Clarification
The Board clarified that prior written
communication with the outgoing auditor is mandatory and must be effective
before acceptance and completion of audit. Further, a Chartered Accountant must
independently verify the legality and authenticity of appointment and removal
resolutions and cannot rely on doubtful or tampered documents furnished by the
client company.
Final
Outcome
The Board of Discipline, ICAI, held that CA
Vijaya Mohan Valiathan was GUILTY of Professional Misconduct under Items
(8) and (9) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949. In exercise of powers under Section 21A(3), the Board imposed a
fine of ₹10,000 upon the respondent by order dated 25.09.2024,
pursuant to its findings dated 27.08.2024.
Source Link - https://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1768816232_CAV.RadhakrishnaPillaivs.CAVijayaMohanValiathanBoardofDisciplineICAI.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is
shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers
should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not
intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and
the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content.
The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment