Facts of the Case
Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against CA Deepak Aggarwal
following information and investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation,
Anti-Corruption Branch, New Delhi. The Respondent was a partner of M/s P.K.
Garg & Associates and represented Shri Krishan Kumar (client) in income-tax
assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2013–14 before Shri P.R. Meena,
Income Tax Officer.
It was alleged that illegal gratification of ₹3.5 lakhs was demanded by
the Income Tax Officer for settling the assessment and that the Respondent
acted as an intermediary and facilitator in arranging and handing over the
bribe amount. A CBI trap was laid on 22 April 2016, during which bribe money
was recovered and the Income Tax Officer was caught red-handed. The Respondent
was alleged to have accepted the bribe amount from the complainant and handed
it over to the public servant.
Issues Involved
Whether the Respondent abetted and facilitated bribery to influence
income-tax assessment proceedings, acted as a co-conspirator with a public
servant, and whether such conduct amounted to “Other Misconduct” under Item (2)
of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Authority’s / Prosecution Allegations
The prosecution relied upon CBI FIR, charge sheet, trap proceedings,
recovery memos, recorded telephonic conversations, forensic voice examination
reports and witness statements to allege that the Respondent knowingly
facilitated payment of illegal gratification and acted as a link between the
complainant and the Income Tax Officer.
Respondent’s Arguments
The Respondent denied the allegations and contended that he was falsely
implicated, that he was unaware of any bribe demand, and that he did not
conspire with the Income Tax Officer. He raised objections regarding
evidentiary value of recorded conversations, alleged procedural lapses, and
submitted that criminal proceedings were pending and disciplinary action should
not be concluded on disputed evidence.
Court / Authority Order and Findings
The Board of Discipline examined the CBI charge sheet, witness
statements, transcripts of recorded conversations, forensic voice examination
report, recovery proceedings and submissions of the Respondent. The Board noted
that recorded telephonic conversations clearly indicated negotiations regarding
bribe amount and the Respondent’s role in coordinating the transaction. The
forensic voice examination confirmed the probability of the Respondent’s voice
in the recorded calls.
The Board observed that the Respondent accepted the bribe amount from
the complainant and handed it over to the Income Tax Officer, thereby acting as
a facilitator and co-conspirator. The Board rejected the defence that the
Respondent was merely acting under pressure or without knowledge, holding that
a Chartered Accountant is expected to resist and report illegal demands rather
than participate in them.
The Board held that offering and facilitating bribe to a public servant
to perform a public function is a serious offence and conduct clearly
unbecoming of a Chartered Accountant, bringing disrepute to the profession.
Important Clarification
The Board clarified that Chartered Accountants must uphold the highest
standards of integrity and are strictly prohibited from facilitating bribery or
illegal gratification in any statutory or quasi-judicial proceedings.
Participation in such acts constitutes grave professional misconduct
irrespective of the outcome of criminal proceedings.
Final Outcome
The ICAI Board of Discipline held CA Deepak Aggarwal (M. No. 092865)
guilty of “Other Misconduct” under Item (2) of Part IV of the First
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Section 22.
In exercise of powers under Section 21A(3) of the Act, by order dated 19
April 2023, the Board directed removal of the name of the Respondent
from the Register of Members for a period of one (1) year and imposed a
monetary fine of ₹1,00,000 (Rupees One Lakh only).
Source
Link- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1768820134_CA.DeepakAggarwalM.No.092865DelhiinRe..pdf
Disclaimer
This
content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only.
Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It
is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The
author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this
content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment