COST INFLATION INDEX [EXPLANATION (v) TO SECTION 48]
BACKGROUND
The intention of
the legislature is to tax the real gain on transfer of the capital asset not
the profit due to inflation. In order to achieve this objective, the
“Indexation” is introduced in capital gain taxation. The indexation benefit is
meant to take into account the inflationary trends between the year of purchase
and the year of sale. The costs incurred on the sale are allowed as deduction
while calculating gains from the sale of both short-term and long-term assets.
Text of Explanation (v) to section 48
“COST INFLATION
INDEX” in relation to a previous year, means such index as the Central
Government may, having regard to 75% of average rise in the Consumer Price
Index (urban) for the immediately preceding previous year to such previous
year, by notification in the official Gazette, specify, in this behalf.”
How to do indexation
Cost of acquisition is computed with the help of following formula:—
Cost of acquisition
(Fair Market Value on 01.04.2001 or
Cost of Acquisition, whichever is more) X Cost
Inflation Index of year of transfer of capital asset
Cost
Inflation Index of the year of acquisition
(or
Base Year i.e. 100)
PROVISIONS ILLUSTRATED:
|
Mr. `X’
purchased a house for Rs. 1,50,000/- in 1998. The fair market
value on 01.04.2001 was Rs. 7,00,000/-. He sold the house
for Rs. 24,00,000 on 19.03.2019. Find out the Indexed cost of
acquisition. |
|
|
SOLUTION: |
|
|
Cost of
acquisition (Fair
Market Value on 01.04.2001 or Cost
of Acquisition, whichever
is more) X Cost Inflation Index of the year in which the asset is
transferred Cost
Inflation Index of the year of acquisition (or Base Year i.e. 100) |
|
|
7,00,000 x 280 = Rs.
19,60,000 100 |
|
Central Government notifies the cost inflation index
Central Government specifies the cost inflation index by notifying in
the official gazette.
Cost Inflation Index = 75% of the average rise in the Consumer Price
Index* (urban) for the immediately preceding year
*Consumer Price Index compares the current price of a basket of goods
and services (which represent the economy) with the price of the same basket of
goods and services in the previous year to calculate the increase in prices.
KEY NOTE:
Consumer Price Index (Urban) – Applicable from the assessment year
2016-17.
Indexation of cost to be allowed
(i) Indexation
of cost will be allowed in case of capital indexed bonds
(ii) In case
of long-term capital gains arising from the transfer of sovereign gold
bond (Third proviso to section 48)
With effect from assessment year
2017-18, the following third proviso has been substituted by the Finance Act,
2016:—
“Provided
also that nothing contained in the second proviso (relating to indexation of
cost) shall apply to the long-term capital gain arising from the transfer of a
long-term capital asset, being a bond or debenture other than—
(a) capital indexed bonds
issued by the Government; or
(b) Sovereign
Gold Bond issued by the Reserve Bank of India under the Sovereign Gold Bond
Scheme, 2015.”
Thus, besides capital indexed bonds,
indexation benefits to long-term capital gains arising on transfer of Sovereign
Gold Bond shall be allowed to all classes of assessees.
Cases where benefit of indexation is not available in the case of
long-term capital assets
In
the following cases, the benefit of indexation is not available even if such
asset is a long-term capital asset:—
|
S. No. |
Nature
of long-term capital asset transferred |
Assessee
(Transferor) not eligible for indexation benefit |
|
(i) |
Short-term
capital assets v In case of depreciable assets, there is no
question of any indexation as capital gain arising from the transfer of
depreciable asset shall always be short-term capital gain.
|
All
Assessees |
|
(ii) |
BONDS
AND DEBENTURES Transfer
of Bonds or Debentures of any company whether public or private or Government
company or bonds of Government [however, benefit is available to capital
indexed bonds issued by Government] except the following: |
All
Assessees |
|
(a)
Capital indexed Bonds issued by the Government; or |
||
|
(b) Sovereign Gold Bond issued by the Reserve
Bank of India under the Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme, 2015 [(Clause (b)
inserted by the Finance Act, 2016, with effect from assessment year 2017-18)] (Proviso
to section 48) |
||
|
(iii) |
SLUMP
SALE UNDER SECTION 50B Undertaking or division transferred by way of slump
sale as covered by section 50B |
All
Assessees |
|
(iv) |
SALE OF
SHARES BY NON-RESIDENT Transfer
of Shares or Debentures acquired by a non-resident in foreign currency in an
Indian company (by utilizing convertible foreign exchange) (Provisos 1 and
2 to Section 48) |
Non-Residents |
|
(v) |
DEPRECIABLE
ASSETS Other
than an asset used by a power generating unit eligible for depreciation on
straight line basis. KEY
NOTE In case
of depreciable assets for which All Assessees
block of assets system is followed, there is no question of any indexation a
capital gain arising from the transfer of depreciable asset shall always be
short-term capital gain |
All
Assessees |
|
(vi) |
Transfer
of Units of Unit Trust of India or Mutual Fund covered under section 10(23D)
purchased in Foreign Currency by overseas financial organization also known
as offshore funds (section 115AB) |
Off
Shore Fund |
|
(vii) |
Receipts
(GDR) or bonds of an Indian company or share or bonds of public sector
company sold by the Government and purchased in foreign currency by a
non-resident (section 115AC) |
Non-Residents |
|
(viii) |
Global
Depository Receipts (GDR) purchased in foreign currencies by an individual
resident in India and employee of an Indian company (section 115ACA) |
Resident
individual |
|
(ix) |
Transfer
of Securities held by Foreign Institutional Investors (section 115AD) |
Foreign
Institutional Investors (FII) |
|
(x) |
Transfer
of Foreign Exchange Asset held by a Non-Resident
Indian (NRI) (section 115D) |
Non-Resident
Indian(NRI) |
|
(xi) |
Transfer
of unlisted securities by non-resident [Clause (c) of proviso to section
112(1)] |
Non-Resident
(not being a company) or a foreign company |
In the above cases, the provisions
relating to indexed cost of acquisition and indexed cost of improvement are not
applicable.
Sale of inherited property – cost inflation index has to be applied with
reference to year in which said capital asset was first acquired by previous
owner [Section 55(2)(b)(ii)]
Dismissing the appeal of
the revenue , the Tribunal held that ; where assessee sells an inherited
property, for computing amount of capital gain, cost inflation index has to be
applied with reference to year in which said capital asset was first acquired
by previous owner. (Assessment year 2007-08)
[ITO v. Sudip Roy (2016) 161 ITD 709 (ITAT Kolata)]
Indexed cost of gifted assets has to be determined with reference to
previous owner
The
facts of the case are that the assessee acquired a residential flat as a gift
from her daughter under a gift deed dated 02.01.2003. The said flat was
originally acquired by the previous owner on 29.01.1993. The assessee sold the
flat on 30.06.2003 and offered long-term capital gains. While calculating the
capital gains, she took the index of year 1993-94. The ITO recomputed the
capital gains with index of 2002-03 and passed order accordingly. The appeal
before CIT (Appeals) and the ITAT was decided in favour of the assessee. The
revenue preferred appeal before the Bombay High Court which was again decided
in favour of the assessee. While delivering the order, the Bombay High Court,
laid down that when the law provides to consider the period of holding of the previous
owner also, then a different treatment cannot be accorded for calculation of
the indexed cost of acquisition by not adopting the cost inflation index of the
year in which the asset was acquired by the previous owner. Therefore, the
court said, indexation should be allowed from the year in which such asset was
acquired by the previous owner.—[CIT v. Manjula J. Shah (2011) 16
Taxmann.com 42]
Indexed cost of acquisition of house inherited from father – Sale of
house inherited from father – Cost of acquisition of house to the assessee has
to be deemed to be the cost for which the previous owner had acquired it
The
facts of the case are that the assessee and her sister were owners of one
residential Kothi in Chandigarh and the same was sold by them in the accounting
year 1992-93. The said house was inherited by the above mentioned ladies from
their father, who died on 17.02.1991. Their father had built the house long
back, i.e., much earlier to 01.04.1981 and had bequeathed the same to his
daughters. Capital gain is worked out by applying the cost inflation index
(denominator) of financial year 1981-82. The ITO and the CIT (Appeals) did not
agree with this, since their view was that the indexed cost of acquisition was
to be worked out with reference to the date on which the father of the assessee
expired i.e. on 17.02.1991 by applying Explanation (iii) to
section 48. The assessee preferred second appeal before the ITAT which decided
the case in favour of the assessees. The Tribunal observed that as the asset
was acquired prior to 1981, the indexed cost of acquisition in the hands of the
previous owner as on 01.04.1981 (100) was to be considered for computing the
capital gains.— [Mrs. Pushpa Sofat v. ITO (2004) 89 TTJ 499 (2002) 81 ITD 1
(ITAT Chandigarh)]
Cost of acquisition – Property inherited indexed cost to be determined
as on 01.04.1981
The assessee
has declared long-term capital gain, claiming the indexation cost as on 1st
April, 1981. The Assessing Officer held that the father of the assessee had
expired on 6th April, 1990 hence indexation will be available only with the
reference to financial year 1990-91. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals)
allowed the claim of indexation from 01.04.1981. On appeal by revenue, the
Tribunal held that as the property was acquired by assessee’s father in 1965
and inherited by assessee on death of his father in 1990, indexed cost of
acquisition of property shall have to be determined as on 1st April, 1981, for
purpose of computation of capital gains. (Related Assessment year 2007-08)—[ACIT
v. Suresh Verma (2012) 135 ITD 102 : 72 DTR 82 (ITAT Delhi)]
Gifted property : Indexation
In
case of transfer by gift, will, trust, etc. indexed cost to be determined with
reference to holding by previous owner
To
be computed with reference to the year in which the previous owner first held
the property.—[Arun Shungloo Trust v. CIT (Del.) ITA No. 116 of 2011, dated
13.02.2012]
Family arrangement is analogous to partition attracting Section 49
[Family arrangement (Settlement)]
In case of property acquired by way
of family settlement dated 01.09.1997, effective from 31.07.1992, for purposes
of computing capital gains, deduction has to be allowed on indexed cost of
acquisition by taking into account its fair market value as on 01.04.1981 [The
property was acquired by the previous owner in 1966] —[ACIT v. Baldev Raj
Charla (2009) 121 TTJ 366 : 18 DTR 413 (Del)]
Cost Inflation
Index
Applicable
from Assessment Year 2018-19 [with Base Year 2001-02]
|
S. No. |
Financial year |
Cost Inflation Index |
|
1 |
2001-02 |
100 |
|
2. |
2002-03 |
105 |
|
3. |
2003-04 |
109 |
|
4 |
2004-05 |
113 |
|
5 |
2005-06 |
117 |
|
6 |
2006-07 |
122 |
|
7 |
2007-08 |
129 |
|
8 |
2008-09 |
137 |
|
9 |
2009-10 |
148 |
|
10 |
2010-11 |
167 |
|
11 |
2011-12 |
184 |
|
12 |
2012-13 |
200 |
|
13 |
2013-14 |
220 |
|
14 |
2014-15 |
240 |
|
15 |
2015-16 |
254 |
|
16 |
2016-17 |
264 |
|
17 |
2017-18 |
272 |
|
18. |
2018-19 |
280 |
Applicable up
to Assessment Year 2017-18 [with Base Year 1981-82]
|
S. No. |
Financial year |
Cost Inflation Index |
|
1. |
1981-1982 |
100 |
|
2. |
1983-1983 |
109 |
|
3. |
1983-1984 |
116 |
|
4. |
1984-1985 |
125 |
|
5. |
1985-1986 |
133 |
|
6. |
1986-1987 |
140 |
|
7. |
1987-1988 |
150 |
|
8. |
1988-1989 |
161 |
|
9. |
1989-1990 |
172 |
|
10. |
1990-1991 |
182 |
|
11. |
1991-1992 |
199 |
|
12. |
1992-1993 |
223 |
|
13. |
1993-1994 |
244 |
|
14. |
1994-1995 |
259 |
|
15. |
1995-1996 |
281 |
|
16. |
1996-1997 |
305 |
|
17. |
1997-1998 |
331 |
|
18. |
1998-1999 |
351 |
|
19. |
1999-2000 |
389 |
|
20. |
2000-2001 |
406 |
|
21. |
2001-2002 |
426 |
|
22. |
2002-2003 |
447 |
|
23. |
2003-2004 |
463 |
|
24. |
2004-2005 |
480 |
|
25. |
2005-2006 |
497 |
|
26. |
2006-2007 |
519 |
|
27. |
2007-2008 |
551 |
|
28. |
2008-2009 |
582 |
|
29. |
2009-2010 |
632 |
|
30. |
2010-2011 |
711 |
|
31. |
2011-2012 |
785 |
|
32. |
2012-2013 |
852 |
|
33. |
2013-2014 |
939 |
|
34. |
2014-2015 |
1024 |
|
35. |
2015-2016 |
1081 |
|
36. |
2016-2017 |
1125 |
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment