Procedure for preparation of Central Scrutiny Report (CSR)
Central Scrutiny Report (CSR), as it is called here, is
essentially a report on the examination of the appeal orders be it that of the
JCIT(A)/CIT(A) or the ITAT or the High Court. Quality of CSR particularly those
relating to the orders of JCIT(A)/CIT(A) and that of ITAT are crucial so far as
the litigation in High Courts and the Supreme Court are concerned. Assessing
Officer has to carefully go through the appellate order being scrutinized to
find out that the facts have been correctly noticed and properly appreciated
therein. Thereafter the application of law should be seen. If the finding of
fact recorded therein is contrary to the materials on record or conclusion
drawn is at variance, then such perversity has to be specifically highlighted.
Scrutiny of the JCIT(A) or
CIT(A)’s order is important
§ The scrutiny of the JCIT(A) or CIT(A)’s
order is important in so much as it is the first stage that marks the beginning
of the litigation.
§ At this stage new facts are also
introduced and by and large the contours of future litigation take shape.
§ The scrutiny of his order has to be
carefully carried out. Only when there is adequate reason(s) to contest the
decision, the appeal should be authorized.
§ Has JCIT(A) or CIT(A) admitted additional
evidence without giving opportunity to A.O.
§ Averments (affirmation) of fact of the
assessee which have been accepted by JCIT(A) or CIT(A), to be checked for
factual inaccuracies.
§ Factual inaccuracies in recording of
facts by JCIT(A) or CIT(A).
§ Have the correct provisions of law been
applied by JCIT(A) or CIT(A)?
§ Are case laws relied by JCIT(A) or CIT(A)
relevant? Distinguishable on facts?
§ All issues to be challenged in appeal
including general observations which would adversely affect Revenue’s case.
§ Also general prayer to amend, alter, etc.
grounds later
Responsibility for Filing of Appeals to ITAT
§ Subject to the Instructions issued by the CBDT
for the time being in force on monetary limits for filing appeals under section
268A, the jurisdictional Pr. CIT/CIT shall be the authority to decide whether
to contest an order of the JCIT(A)/CIT(A), in the light of the facts and
circumstances of a particular case and the statutory provisions.
§ While taking decision in the matter, he shall,
inter alia, take into consideration reports of the authorities below.
§ Every appeal should be filed within 60 days of
the receipt of JCIT(A)/CIT(A) order.
§ Once the Pr. CIT/CIT communicates his decision
to contest a particular order of CIT(A), it shall be the responsibility of the
Range Head to ensure timely and proper filing of appeal in the ITAT and
consequential follow up actions.
§ The actual filing of appeal is to be ensured by
the Assessing Officer (AO).
Responsibility for Filing of Appeals to High Court [SOP
on filing of Appeals to High Court]
[CBDT Instruction No. 7/2011, Dated 24.05.2011]
§ Jurisdictional CCIT to decide whether to
file appeal in High Court
§ Jurisdictional Pr. CIT/CIT to ensure
timely and proper filing of appeal
§ Appeal should be filed within 120 days of
the receipt of ITAT order
§ Appeal to be filed only on Substantial
Question of Law
Content of Central Scrutiny Report (CSR)
The CSR should broadly conform to following parameters.
§ The issue involved should be concisely
stated as is recorded in the assessment order.
§ If any additional evidences have been
relied upon to decide the issue adversely, without affording the AO an
opportunity to examine the same, it should be so stated. If the AO was provided
an opportunity then there can be no grievance on this count.
§ If a finding of fact has been recorded,
which is contrary to the evidences on record, then such perversity should be
clearly demonstrated in the scrutiny report.
§ The ratio of judicial precedents relied
upon by the appellate authority is appropriate i.e. factual matrix of cases
relied upon and that of the case at hand are identical.
§ If a particular issue is recurring from
earlier years, then the latest status must be ascertained. If finality has been
reached on that issue in the meanwhile, then further appeal should not be
recommended.
§ Most importantly, non-acceptance of the
appellate decision on any point must be backed up by valid reasons.
AO should suggest the proposed grounds of appeal
If there are several observations in respect of an issue
which are adverse but not acceptable, these should be separately challenged
under sub paragraph of the main ground.
Usually the grounds of appeal are drafted by the
ITO(Judicial) in the o/o CIT in a mechanical manner If AO suggests the proposed
grounds of appeal, the CIT would have better input to draft/approve the grounds
of appeal.
Grounds of Appeal
§ Should be brief and specific
§ Should not be argumentative
§ Should avoid repetition
§ Should not contain intemperate language
§ Should not refer to case laws unless binding
decisions
§ In fact, apart from the quality of assessments
framed by an officer, the comments on CSRs and on audit objections indicate
his/her technical competence in real sense.
Officers concerned to clearly spell out the
following issues in CSR
JCIT(A) or CIT(A)’s
Orders
While giving comments / recommendations or taking decision
to contest JCIT(A) or CIT(A)’s order, the officers concerned shall, inter alia,
ensure that the following issues have been taken into consideration:
(a) Facts of the case and basis of addition
/ disallowance are clearly brought out.
(b) Reasons for granting relief by the
JCIT(A) or CIT(A)on the relevant issues are clearly spelt out.
(c) The reasons as to why the JCIT(A) or
CIT(A)was not justified in recording the findings of fact or law on each issue
are clearly brought out. Evasive stand or ambiguous language is to be avoided.
(d) If any factual finding by JCIT(A) or
CIT(A)is inconsistent with or contrary to the material on record, the relevant
material should be clearly identified to show perversity.
(e) Cogent reasons for the decision to file
appeal on relevant issues are properly and clearly recorded by the Pr. CIT/CIT,
as this will constitute the basis for further litigation in appropriate cases.
(f) The grounds of appeal arising out of
the order of JCIT(A) or CIT(A)are carefully drafted to clearly spell out the
grievance of the department and the relief sought.
(g) In case of mixed question of facts and
law, the grounds of appeal should clearly bring out specific legal and factual
issues to be contested.
(h) The grounds are precise and not
argumentative.
(i) JCIT(A) or CIT(A) order not
acceptable on merits but appeal not filed due to tax effect below the
prescribed monetary limit.
§ Has the ITAT adjudicated on all grounds raised
in the appeal? Has it travelled beyond the grounds raised in appeal?
§ Is the finding of fact given by ITAT correct or
contrary to facts on record?
§ Has the ITAT considered all relevant and
material facts and evidences?
§ Is the conclusion drawn by ITAT such that a
reasonable person would reach?
§ Has the ITAT made some observations which would
adversely affect the case of Revenue if left unchallenged?
§ Have the correct provisions of law been applied
by ITAT?
§ Are case laws relied by ITAT relevant?
§ Distinguishable on facts? Any Special Bench /
jurisdictional High Court/ Supreme Court decision ignored?
§ Is application for rectification required?
§ Can the ITAT order be challenged on the grounds
of perversity ?
§ If yes, a specific question on perversity to be
raised before High Court.
§ Questions of law to be correctly drafted
§ All issues to be challenged including general
observations which would adversely affect Revenue’s case.
High Court
§ All the above points to be seen.
§ Has the High Court adjudicated on all questions
of law raised in the appeal?
§ Has it travelled beyond the questions raised in
appeal?
§ Are case laws relied by High Court relevant?
Distinguishable on facts? Any Full Bench High Court/ Supreme Court decision
ignored?
§ Is a review required? If yes, it has to be
filed within 30 days of the date of order.
§ SLP not to be recommended lightly.
§ First frame the substantial question of law
which arises from High Court’s order. This helps achieve clarity.
Role of the Range Head
§ There is a perception amongst the Addl./Joint
CIT that they have a role of post office.
§ The CSR received from the AO is merely
forwarded by way of endorsement to the CIT with contributing even one sentence
in a large number of cases.
§ This is not at all a responsible attitude on
the part of the middle management officers.
§ The Range head is expected to critically
examine the CSR with reference to its factual and legal content.
§ A real and meaningful assistance to the Pr.
CIT/CIT has to come from this level by way of citation of judicial precedents
relevant to the issue under consideration.
Appeal Effect and Scrutiny Report
§ On receipt of the order of the JCIT(A) or CIT(A), the AO shall give appeal effect
promptly and properly. The Range Head shall monitor correctness and timely
appeal effect in respect of orders of JCIT(A) or CIT(A).
§ Any pendency in regard to the appeal effect
beyond one month shall be reported by the Range Head to the Pr. CIT/CIT in the
DO reporting monthly activities of the Range, along with reasons for the delay.
No Central Scrutiny Reports are required to be sent
§ All appeals dismissed by ITAT or High Court due
to tax effect being below monetary limit prescribed, even though the order of
the ITAT or High Court is not acceptable.
§ All appeals decided in favour of the revenue
and against the assessee.
Check List - Quality Scrutiny Reports, Streamlining
Litigation
CIT(A) Stage
§ Furnishing of Form No. ITNS 51, duly filled by
Assessing Officer (A.O.) to CIT(A)
§ Personal representation by the A.O. before
CIT(A) in important cases
§ Timely submission of Remand Report by A.O. duly
approved by the Range head to CIT(A)
ITAT stage
§ Preparation of paper book by A.O.
§ Furnishing of brief by A.O. to the Sr. D.R.
§ Filing of cross objections, wherever required
Appeal not to be filed by the department in certain cases
§ The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) vide a
Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 has prescribed the monetary limits for
filing of appeal by the income-tax department before the Income-tax Appellate
Tribunals and High Courts and Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme
Court.
§ Further, it states that all the existing
departmental appeals having tax effect below the prescribed monetary limits
should be pursued for dismissal as withdrawn/not pressed.
|
S. No. |
Appeals/SLPs
in Income-tax matters |
Monetary
Limit (in Rs.) |
|
(1) |
Before
Appellate Tribunal |
50,00,000 |
|
(2) |
Before
High Court |
1,00,00,000 |
|
(3) |
Before
Supreme Court |
2,00,00,000 |
Appeals may be filed on merits as an exception
[1] Cases where organised tax-evasion scam is
noticed through bogus Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG)/Short Term Capital Loss
(STCL) on penny stocks [CBDT Circular No. 23/2019, dated 06.09.2019 and Office
Memorandum No. 279, dated 16.09.2019]
[2] Monetary limits specified in para 3 above
shall not apply to writ matters. – [CBDT Circular No. 5/2019, Dated 05.02.2019]
[3] Amendment to para 10 of the Circular No. 3 of
2018, dated 11.07.2018 - Regarding [CBDT letter F No 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ
(Pt), dated 20.08.2018]
Para 10 of the Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 is
hereby amended as under:
“10. Adverse judgments relating to the following issues
should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is
less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax
effect:
§ Where the Constitutional validity of the
provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge, or
§ Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction
or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or
§ Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has
been accepted by the Department, or
§ Where addition relates to undisclosed foreign
income/undisclosed foreign assets (including financial assets)/ undisclosed
foreign bank account.
§ Where addition is based on information received
from external sources in the nature of law enforcement agencies such as CBI/
ED/ DRI/ SFIO/ Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI).
§ Cases where prosecution has been filed by the
Department and is pending in the Court.”
Time-barred appeals
(i) If appeals are time
barred by limitation, an application for condonation of delay along with the
affidavit explaining the delay should be attached.
(ii) In cases of
extraordinary delay, a detailed affidavit explaining each day of delay should
be attached.
Appeal title
(i) The Appeal title should show specific Pr. CIT or CIT in case
the Appeal before the High Court. For example CIT-III Chennai or
CIT-XII Delhi or DIT (Exemption), Ahmedabad or CIT(C)-II, Mumbai etc. The
Appeal title should show ITO or Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax or Deputy
Commissioner of Income Tax as the case may be in case the Appeal before the
ITAT.
(ii) The ITA number,
that is, the appeal number given by the Appellate Tribunal should be correctly
mentioned in appeal title in the memo of appeal.
(iii) The relevant section under
which appeal is filed should be mentioned in the title.
Appeal Register & CSR module of the ITBA
ITBA-Appeal Register & CSR Instruction No. 1 [F. No.
System/ITBA/Instruction/Appeal Register & CSR/185/2016-17/] Dated:
03.02.2017
Subject: Launch of Appeal Register & CSR module of
Income Tax Business Application (ITBA) – Reg.
The Appeal Register & CSR module of the ITBA can be
accessed by entering the following URL in the browser: https://itba.incometax.gov.in
Path for the module is: ITBA Portal à Login à Modules à Appeal
Register & CSR
The CSR module has been designed primarily based on the
CBDT’s Instructions No. 4/2011,7/2011 & 8/2011.
Following functionalities shall be available through ITBA –
Appeal Register & CSR Module:
A. Appeal Receipt Register
On receipt of an appellate order1 the PCIT/CIT or HQ &
Staff of PCIT/CIT shall enter the basic details of such order in the Appeal
Receipt Register, maintained in the office of the PCIT/CIT. The period of
limitation for filing of further appeal will be based on date of receipt of the
Appellate order in the office of the PCIT/CIT.
Following functions can be performed in the Appeal Receipt
Register:
§ PCIT/CIT /HQ of PCIT/Staff of PCIT/CIT can
select the receipt date, Appellate authority and enter other particulars of the
Appeal order and Save. Such entry would then be visible to the concerned range
Head and the AO, so as to enable the AO to initiate the CSR workflow.
§ If required, the AO/ Staff can also edit
details of an Appellate order entered by the office of PCIT and save such
details (except date of receipt of Appellate order).
§ On completion of various appeal filing
processes, details of new appeals filed will keep getting updated so that User
can monitor the same, for the purpose of scrutiny selection, keeping penalty in
abeyance, recovery of demand etc.
B. CSR on CIT(A) Order:
Following are the steps to prepare CSR on CIT(A) Order:
§ AO will enter Appeal order details and then
proceed to analyse the order of CIT(A) as per the proforma. After completing
analysis, AO will submit the request to Range.
§ Range Head will discuss the issues involved and
wherever applicable, enter the draft grounds of appeal with his recommendation
for filing appeal. Range will there after submit the request to PCIT.
§ PCIT will record the decision whether appeal is
to be filed or not and transfer the work item to AO with the directions on
filing of appeal. PCIT will also be able to issue Authorisation letter to the
AO for filing of appeal.
§ In case appeal is to be filed, AO will generate
Form 36 and enter the details of filing of appeal with ITAT. Once details are
saved AO will close the workflow. On closure status of the request will be
updated in Appeal Receipt Register as well.
§ Facility to submit, delegate and send back the
workitem is available to the users.
§ Facility to download and print the content of
CSR is also available to the user. A printout can be generated at any stage by
clicking on Print button. A pdf file will get download and the User can then
print the downloaded file
C. CSR on ITAT Order:
Following are the steps to prepare CSR on ITAT Order:
§ AO will record various aspects of the ITAT’s
order and provide necessary analysis of the appellate order. After doing the
analysis AO will submit the request to Range.
§ Range Head will record the issues involved and
will enter the draft grounds of appeal with recommendation for filing appeal,
wherever applicable. Range will there after submit the request to PCIT/CIT.
§ PCIT/CIT will record his recommendation whether
appeal has to be filed or not and draft Substantial Question of Law. He will
then submit the request to CIT(Judicial).
§ CIT(Judicial) will view the recommendation on
filing appeal and then submit the request to CCIT with his observations.
§ CCIT will make the decision whether appeal has
to be filed or not. Once decision is taken by CCIT, the workflow will be sent
to PCIT.
§ PCIT/CIT will then issue necessary directions
to AO by clicking on Direction on filing, and the workitem will then flow to AO
for filing of appeal.
§ Facility to download and print the content of
CSR is also available to the user. A printout can be generated at any stage by
clicking on Print button. A pdf file will get download and the User can then
print the downloaded file
§ After filing the appeal, AO will update the
details in Filing of Appeal Tab and thereafter will close the workflow. Once
workflow is closed status will be updated in Appeal Receipt Register.
§ Facility to submit, delegate and send back the
workitem is available to the users.
D. CSR on High Court Order:
Following are the steps to prepare CSR on High Court Order,
where appeal is proposed to be filed by preparing Proforma B:
§ PCIT will enter the following details:
Ø Details of high court judgment along with
limitation date for filing SLP in Supreme Court.
Ø Facts of the case in brief.
Ø Substantial question of law to be proposed in
the SLP.
Ø Details of respondent as well as his own
communication details.
Ø Thereafter, he will submit the request to CCIT.
§ CCIT will record his comments/recommendation
and assign the workflow to PCIT.
§ PCIT will record the comments of CCIT in
Performa B and thereafter physically sent the Proforma B report to the
Directorate of L&R alongwith necessary annexures.
§ In case appeal is not to be filed, PCIT will
close the workflow.
§ Facility to download and print the content of
CSR is also available to the user. A printout can be generated at any stage by
clicking on Print button. A pdf file will get download and the User can then
print the downloaded file
§ Once appeal is filed, AO will enter and save
the details of filing of appeal and close the workflow.
§ Once workflow is closed status will be updated
in Appeal Receipt Register.
§ Facility to submit, delegate and send back the
workitem is available to the users.
Relevant CBDT Circulars & Instructions
§ CBDT Circular No. 23 of 2019, Dated
06.09.2019
Subject: Exception
to monetary limits for filing appeals specified in any Circular issued under
Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Regarding
§ CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, Dated :
08.08.2019
Subject: Further
Enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme
Court – Amendment to Circular 3 of 2018 – Measures for reducing litigation
§ CBDT Circular No. 5/2019, Dated
05.02.2019
Subject : Monetary
limits for filing/withdrawal of Wealth Tax appeals by the Department before
ITAT, HCs and SLPs/appeals before SC through extending the scope of Circular 3
of 2018 – Measures for reducing litigation
§ CBDT issues directions on filing of
Appeal on merit on 7 Issues - F. No. 279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ, dated : 11.12.2018
Subject: Clarification
w.r.t. para 10 of Circular 3 of 2018 - Regarding
Proforma for ‘Scrutiny Report’ on ITAT’s order
Limitation
to file appeal under section 253(2) expires on……………………(Parts 1 to 4 are to be
filled in by the Assessing Officer and 5 to 6 by Range Head.)
1. TO
BE FILLED IN ALL THE CASES OF ORDERS OF CIT(A)
Particulars
from the order under scrutiny
|
S.No. |
Points |
Particulars |
|
|
i. |
Appellate Authority whose order is under Scrutiny ITA No.
and date of the order. |
|
|
|
ii. |
Name and address of the assessee |
|
|
|
iii. |
PAN |
|
|
|
iv. |
Assessment Year |
|
|
|
v |
Date of receipt of the order |
|
|
|
vi |
Date of giving appeal effect |
|
|
|
vii |
Details of giving appeal effect |
|
|
|
viii |
Overall Tax effect of the order |
|
|
|
ix |
Despite low tax effect do you suggest appeal? |
|
|
2. TO
BE FILLED IN ONLY IN THE CASES OF ORDERS OF CIT(A) ADVERSE TO REVENUE
Information
relevant to decision making for filing further appeal by the CIT, wherever
applicable
|
S. No. |
Points |
Particulars |
|
i. |
Whether it is combined order for more than one assessment
years |
|
|
ii. |
If yes, specify assessment years involved and identify
specific issues related to different assessment years for filing separate
appeals. Use Annexure, if required. |
|
|
iii. |
Whether it is combined order for more than one assessee. |
|
|
iv |
If yes, whether jurisdiction of all assesses falls in the
same Range? |
|
|
v |
If reply to (iv) above is no, identify the Assessing
Officer/Range having jurisdiction over other assesses for communication of
stand taken on common issues? |
|
|
vi |
If the proceedings of order under scrutiny was dependent
on some other proceedings, specify the present appellate status of the other
proceedings along with ITA No./W.P. No. etc. |
|
3. DETAILS
OF ISSUES ON WHICH RELIEF ALLOWED BY CIT(A)
|
i. |
For
each issue on which relief is allowed by the CIT(A) specify:- |
Relevant
page / Para No. of
|
i(a) |
Issue
involved before CIT(A) |
Scrutiny
report of AO(As mentioned below as per annexure ‘A’) |
|||||
|
ii |
Tax
effect in respect of each issue on which
relief is allowed by CIT(A) |
Aggregate
tax effect |
|||||
|
|
As per
order |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii. |
Whether
any factual finding given by CIT(A) is contrary to material on record? If
yes, specify in detail indicating specific para of order under scrutiny &
material on record contradicting such a finding. |
|
|||||
|
iv. |
Whether
similar issue involved in the case of assessee in earlier year(s)? If yes,
then mention the year and present status of appeal. |
|
|||||
|
v |
If same
issue is involved in subsequent years in the case of assessee, stand taken by
the Assessing Officer/Status of appeal, if any. |
|
|||||
|
vi |
Has
CIT(A) relief upon any judicial decision? If yes, has a copy been annexed or
citation given in case of reported decisions? (Note: Whether the relied upon
decision has been challenged in further appeal? If so, the present
status may be given?. |
|
|||||
|
vii |
Whether
notice of hearing was received by AO? |
|
|||||
|
viii |
Whether
additional evidence was produced by the assessee at the appellate stage? |
|
|||||
|
ix |
Whether
on additional evidence the AO was given opportunity as required under rule
45A? |
|
|||||
|
x |
Whether
any of the CBDT Instruction/Circular/ notification is subject matter of
adverse order? |
|
|||||
|
xi |
Whether
constitutionality of any provisions of the Act is under challenge? |
|
|||||
|
xii |
Whether
any question of law of recurring nature is involved? |
|
|||||
|
xiii |
Whether
the issue arises out of audit objection? |
|
|||||
|
xiv |
If yes,
whether audit objection is included in Draft Para? Also state whether Audit
objection has been accepted by the department or not? |
|
|||||
|
xv |
Is any
prosecution proceeding pending or contemplated in the case on the issue on
which the appeal is sought to be filed? |
|
|||||
*Item (iv)
is extremely important, if applicable, (the involvement of issue in earlier
year(s) may already be indicated in assessment order or CIT(A)’s order)
4. GENERAL
|
i |
If
aggregate tax effect in 3(ii) above is below the limit prescribed for filing
of appeal in CBDT Instruction No.5/2014? Whether
the case falls in any of the exception laid down in the said
Instruction? If so,
specify clause No. |
|
|
ii |
Due date
for submission of report to Range head |
- |
ANNEXURE ‘A’
Brief
Facts :-
Income Tax Officer, ….
……………………
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment