Facts of the Case
The petitioner, United Health Group Information
Services Private Limited, had filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT) against the order passed by the Dispute Resolution Panel dated
31.10.2013. During the pendency of the appeal, the Tribunal initially granted
stay of the tax demand on 31.03.2014, subject to the petitioner depositing a
sum of Rs. 3 crore, which was duly complied with by the petitioner.
Subsequently, the Tribunal extended the interim
stay by order dated 26.09.2014. However, in view of the judgment in CIT v.
Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd., the Tribunal was held to have no authority to
extend the stay beyond 365 days from the date of the initial stay order. As the
statutory period of 365 days expired on 30.03.2015, and the appeal could not be
heard for reasons not attributable to the petitioner, the petitioner approached
the High Court seeking continuation of the stay till disposal of the appeal.
Issues
Involved
- Whether the High Court can exercise writ jurisdiction under Article
226 to extend a stay of tax demand after expiry of the statutory period of
365 days under Section 254(2A) of the Income-tax Act?
- Whether continuation of stay can be granted where delay in disposal
of appeal is not attributable to the assessee?
Petitioner’s
Arguments
- The petitioner argued that the Tribunal had already granted
conditional stay after considering the merits of the case.
- The petitioner had complied with the condition by depositing Rs. 3
crore.
- The delay in disposal of the appeal was not attributable to the
petitioner.
- Since the appeal was still pending before the Tribunal and listed
for hearing, coercive recovery during pendency would cause undue hardship.
- The petitioner relied upon various orders where the High Court had
exercised writ jurisdiction to continue stay till disposal of appeal.
Respondent’s
Arguments
- The Revenue relied on the statutory restriction and judicial
precedent holding that the Tribunal cannot extend stay beyond 365 days.
- It was contended that once the statutory period expired, the
Tribunal became functus officio in relation to further extension of stay.
Court
Findings / Order
The Delhi High Court observed that while the
Tribunal lacked authority to extend the stay beyond 365 days, there was no
prohibition upon the High Court exercising its extraordinary writ jurisdiction
under Article 226 in appropriate circumstances.
The Court held that where the assessee had complied
with the conditions of stay and the delay in hearing was not attributable to
the assessee, the ends of justice warranted continuation of protection against
coercive recovery.
Accordingly, the Court directed that the stay
granted by the Tribunal shall continue till disposal of the appeal by the
Tribunal. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Important
Clarification
This judgment clarifies that although the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot extend a stay of demand beyond the statutory cap
of 365 days under Section 254(2A), the High Court retains constitutional powers
under Article 226 to grant or continue such protection where justice demands
and the assessee is not responsible for delay.
This decision reinforces the principle that
statutory limitations on tribunal powers do not curtail the constitutional
jurisdiction of the High Court.
Sections /
Legal Provisions Involved
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India (Writ Jurisdiction)
- Section 254(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Power of ITAT to grant stay)
- Assessment Year:
2009–10
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2015:DHC:3291-DB/BDA10042015CW34782015.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising
from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment