FOLLOW FOR MORE UPDATES:-

GLOBALCA (Click here to view)

FOR JOBS (Click here to view)

 

SEMINAR UPDATE:-

Karol Bagh CPE Study Circle of NIRC of ICAI Seminar will be held at 5:00 PM on Monday, 15th December 2025, as per following program:

 

Venue: Hotel Orange Tree, Gurudwara Road Karol Bagh New Delhi

Speaker & Topics: CA Nitin Kanwar

Topic:  Decoding Of Income Tax 2025

Time: 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM

CPE Hours: 2

For Registration & further details, please contact: CA Rajesh K Agrawal -9868156062 (ONLY WHATSAPP)

Thanks & Regards,

Karol Bagh CPE Study Circle of NIRC of ICAI

 

WORD OF WISDOM: -

True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us.

SEBI UPDATES: -

SEBI has issued a new circular regarding Deferment of timeline for implementation of Phase III of Nomination Circular dated January 10, 2025 read with Circular dated February 28, 2025 and July 30, 2025(Click here to view)

 CASE LAW: - Income Tax Act,1961

Source: itatonline.org

Abdul Mannan v. ITO (CALCUTTA HIGH COURT)

ITAT/170/2025 IA NO: GA/1/2025

S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Tribunal remanding matter with cost-Cost of ₹50,000 imposed on small trader held to be harsh and unjustified – Order of Tribunal set aside. [S. 250(6), 254(2B), 260A]

The assessee, a small trader of glass articles, filed appeal against the order of the ITAT, Kolkata `SMC’ Bench, for AY 2017–18. The ITAT had remanded the matter to the AO for fresh assessment but imposed a cost of ₹50,000 payable to Legal Aid Services, citing repeated non-compliance of notices. On appeal the assessee explained that due to ill health, poor knowledge of online compliances, and complete reliance on a consultant who failed to appear, he could not attend proceedings before the AO and CIT (A). The High Court observed that the CIT (A)’s order suffered from violation of S. 250(6) as it did not deal with grounds raised by the assessee. The ITAT itself had accepted that the matter required a fresh assessment. In such circumstances, imposing heavy cost on an individual small trader would be harsh and unjustified. The Court accordingly set aside the cost, while remanding the matter to the AO with direction to issue fresh notice and complete assessment after giving full opportunity to the assessee, who undertook to cooperate in the proceedings. Substantial questions of law were left open. Court held that when Tribunal itself finds that matter needs to be remanded, imposing hefty cost on small assessee for restoration is unjustified.( AY. 2017 -18 ) (ITAT/170/2025, GA/1/2025, dt. 09/09/2025 )

Editorial: Order of Tribunal in Abdul Mannan v. ITO, ITA No. 738/Kol/2025 dt. 15-7-2025 (SMC) (AY. 2017-18), levying cost of Rs .50,000/ was set aside.

[Coaram : Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam and Hon’ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)](Click here to view)

 

GST FAQs: -

Question: If a trader purchases directly from manufacturer & has documents showing excise, will he get full excise credit or 40% of CGST?

Answer: - Full transition credit of such duty will be available on stock in hand in respect of which you have duty paying excise document subject to conditions under Section 140(3) of the CGST Act.