Facts of the Case

  1. The Commissioner of Income Tax filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
  2. The appeal arose from Assessment Year 2004-05.
  3. The assessee, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., had claimed depreciation at the rate of 60% on computer accessories and peripherals.
  4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] accepted the assessee's claim and allowed depreciation at the higher rate.
  5. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A).
  6. Aggrieved by the concurrent findings of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, the Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether computer peripherals and accessories such as printers, scanners and servers are entitled to depreciation at the rate applicable to computers?
  2. Whether such peripherals can be regarded as an integral part of a computer system for the purpose of claiming depreciation?
  3. Whether the Tribunal erred in law in granting depreciation at 60% instead of the normal rate of 25%?

Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)

The Revenue contended that:

  • The Tribunal had committed an error in law by allowing depreciation at the higher rate of 60%.
  • Computer peripherals and accessories should not be equated with computers and computer software.
  • Printers, scanners, servers and similar equipment are distinct assets and therefore should not receive the depreciation rate prescribed for computers.
  • The depreciation should have been restricted to the normal rate of 25%.

Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)

The assessee's position, which was accepted by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, was that:

  • Printers, scanners, servers and other peripherals are functionally integrated with computers.
  • Such accessories form an inseparable and essential part of the computer system.
  • These devices cannot effectively perform their intended functions independently of a computer.
  • Consequently, they are entitled to the same depreciation treatment as computers.
  • The claim was supported by judicial precedents already recognized by various benches of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Court Order / Findings

The Delhi High Court upheld the orders of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal.

The Court observed that:

  • The issue was already covered by earlier decisions of coordinate benches of the Tribunal.
  • In ITO v. Samiran Majumdar (2006) 98 ITD 119, it was held that printers and scanners are integral parts of a computer system and therefore qualify for depreciation at 60%.
  • In Expeditors International (India) (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2008) 118 TTJ 652, it was held that peripherals such as printers, scanners and servers form part of the computer and are eligible for depreciation at the rate applicable to computers.
  • Computer accessories and peripherals cannot be effectively used without a computer.
  • Since these accessories form an integral part of the computer system, they are entitled to depreciation at the higher rate of 60%.

Result

  • The Revenue's appeal was dismissed in limine.
  • Depreciation at the rate of 60% on computer peripherals and accessories was upheld.
  • The findings of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal were affirmed.

Important Clarification

  1. Computer peripherals and accessories must be evaluated based on their functional relationship with the computer system.
  2. Printers, scanners, servers and similar devices are not independent machinery when used as part of an integrated computer environment.
  3. Where an asset functions as an essential component of a computer system, it qualifies for the same depreciation treatment as the computer itself.
  4. The inability of peripherals to operate effectively without a computer supports their classification as part of the computer system.
  5. The judgment reinforces the principle that depreciation classification should be determined by functional use and integration rather than by separate physical identity.

Sections Involved

  • Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Depreciation on Assets
  • Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Appeal to High Court

Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2010:DHC:4269-DB/MMH31082010ITA12662010.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.