Limitation Under Section 153 Applies to DRP Proceedings Under Section 144C – Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Ltd., Supreme Court (2025 INSC 946)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 647
Read More »
The Supreme Court of India, in Civil Appeals arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 20569–20572 of 2023, reported as 2025 INSC 946, examined the statutory framework governing assessment proceedings for eligible assessees unde...

Income-tax Prosecution Cannot Continue After Settlement Commission Grants Penalty Immunity Without Proof of Wilful Evasion – Vijay Krishnaswami @ Krishnaswami Vijayakumar v. Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Supreme Court (2025 INSC 1048)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 504
Read More »
n the Supreme Court of India, the Criminal Appeals arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 3618–3620 of 2024 were decided on 28 August 2025, reported as 2025 INSC 1048. The appeals were filed by Vijay Krishnaswami challenging t...

Temporary Break in Business Is Not Business Closure – Pride Foramer S.A. vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr., Supreme Court (2025 INSC 1247)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 370
Read More »
In the Supreme Court of India judgment reported as 2025 INSC 1247 delivered on 17 October 2025, the Apex Court addressed appeals arising from Income Tax Appeal Nos. 49 of 2005, 91 & 98 of 2006 relating to assessment ...

GST Goods Detention for Route Deviation Unsustainable Without Proof of Tax Evasion — Section 129 Penalty Set Aside by Karnataka High Court | M/s. Hysum Steel v. JCCT (Appeals) (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 758
Read More »
Goods detention for alleged route deviation despite valid invoice-s.129 penalty set aside for lack of evasion proof KARNATAKA HIGH COURT-M/s. Hysum Steel Versus The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal...

Ex-parte GST Adjudication and Cancellation of Registration Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice — Karnataka High Court | D.V. Constructions v. Union of India (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 453
Read More »
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - petitioner had failed to file his monthly returns for a continues period of six months - adjudication order passed without granting an opportunity of personal hearing t...

Parallel GST Proceedings Barred under Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act — Karnataka High Court Quashes State GST Order | M/s. Electronic City Motors v. Union of India (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 912
Read More »
Parallel GST proceedings on same show-cause notice u/s6(2)(b) barred; State GST order quashed, writ allowed.KARNATAKA HIGH COURT- M/s. Electronic City Motors v. Union of India & Ors. Writ Petition No. 7050 of 2025...

Sponsorship Payments for ICC Brand Usage Treated as Royalty: Delhi High Court Upholds 15% TDS under Section 195 – LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. v. DIT (International Taxation) [2025]

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 426
Read More »
The writ petition was filed by LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. challenging the order passed under Section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby permission sought under Section 195 for remittance of payments to Global Cr...

Sanction for Prosecution under Section 276B Cannot Be Mechanical Where TDS Is Paid with Interest – Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Sanction in M/s GM Infinite Dwelling India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. VersusThe Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Bengaluru & Anr.

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 538
Read More »
Sanction for Prosecution under Section 276B r/w Section 278B — Requirement of Application of Mind, Reasonable Cause, and Limits of Criminalisation of TDS Defaults Karnataka High Court:-M/s GM Infinite Dwelling ...

Stock-in-Trade of Jeweller Recorded in Books and Supported by Contemporaneous Evidence Cannot Be Seized Under Sections 132/132A – Bombay High Court Orders Unconditional Release | Mahavir Jewellers NX LLP v. DDIT (Inv.) (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 309
Read More »
Stock-in-Trade Recorded in Books and Supported by Contemporaneous Evidence Not Liable to SeizureThe Bombay High Court held that stock-in-trade of a jeweller, duly recorded in the books of account and explained through co...

Depreciation on Block of Assets Cannot Be Denied for Non-Use of Individual Units – Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CIT v. Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. (AY 2003-04)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 322
Read More »
Depreciation on Block of Assets Not Deniable Due to Non-Use of Certain Units During the Relevant Assessment YearThe Madras High Court held that depreciation allowable on a block of assets cannot be denied merely because ...