Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
948,387
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Rajesh Katyal vs Income Tax Department, New Delhi (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Non-Retrospective Application of Benami Law | Section 53 PBPT Act

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged a Show Cause Notice dated 04 April 2022 issued under Section 53 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (as amended in 2016).The notice pertained to alle...

Inder Singh vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) – Section 68 Addition Unsustainable Without Books of Accounts | AY 2009-10

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 178
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the assessee (Inder Singh) before the Delhi High Court challenging the order dated 23.08.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), along with the subsequ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 vs Westin Hotel Management LP & Sheraton Overseas Management Corporation | Delhi High Court | Section 9(1)(vii) – Fee for Technical Services | Indo-US DTAA Article 12

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 160
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging a common order dated 29 April 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2015–16. The dispute pertained to ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 vs Westin Hotel Management LP & Sheraton Overseas Management Corporation (Delhi High Court) – Centralized Services Not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) & Indo-US DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 163
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessees, foreign entities, provided centralized services to Indian customers, including: Sales and marketing Loyalty programs Reservation services Technological and ope...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA (Delhi High Court) – Booking Fees Taxability, PE Profit Attribution & Section 234B Interest

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 161
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court concerning Assessment Years 2007–08, 2008–09, 2010–11, and 2011–12. The appeals arose from a common order dated 26.10....

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA – No Substantial Question of Law Where Issues Covered by Supreme Court & HC Precedents | Sections 195 & 234B | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 169
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court against a common order dated 26.10.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Years 2007-08, 2008-...

Cluster Overseas Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Ward 6(1), Delhi (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Section 148 Notice Validity, Date of Issuance & Reassessment Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 173
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Cluster Overseas Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the legality of notices dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Y...

Vikram Bhatnagar (Legal Representative of Late Virendra Kumar Bhatnagar) vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Invalid Assessment Proceedings Against Deceased Assessee under Sections 143(2), 143(3), 156 & 270A of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vikram Bhatnagar, acting as the legal representative of Late Shri Virendra Kumar Bhatnagar, challenged the validity of assessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA (Delhi High Court) – PE Attribution, Royalty vs Business Income & Section 195/234B Clarified

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 168
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court concerning Assessment Years 2007–08, 2008–09, 2010–11, and 2011–12. These appeals arose from a common order dated 26.1...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Jay Ambey Aromatics (Delhi High Court) – Section 153A Addition Without Incriminating Material Not Sustainable

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 179
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Years 2008-09 to 2011-12. The ITAT had delet...