Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Moothedan Overseas vs Assistant State Tax Officer (Intelligence) & Anr. – Kerala High Court Directs Completion of GST Detention Proceedings Under Section 129 of CGST/SGST Acts Within Two Months
Facts of the CaseMoothedan Overseas approached the Kerala High Court in
connection with proceedings initiated against it under Section 129 of the
CGST/SGST Acts.The record shows that the underlying transaction was
sup...
M/s Singh Construction vs State of Bihar & Ors. – Patna High Court Quashes Ex Parte GST Assessment and Appellate Orders for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice | Sections 73 & 107 of the CGST/BGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Singh Construction, challenged the
appellate order dated 28.02.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner
of State Tax (Appeals), Patna West Division, whereby multiple GST appeals f...
M/s. Khoday India Limited vs Joint Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Ors. – Service Tax SCN on Liquor Licence Fees Quashed in Part; Section 117 of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 Grants Retrospective Exemption for Grant of Liquor Licence
Facts of the CaseM/s. Khoday India Limited approached the Karnataka High
Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging,
among other matters, the constitutional validity and legality of provi...
M/s Kedia Trading vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others – Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022 Held Ultra Vires | Sections 8 & 62 of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915
Facts of the
CaseA batch of
writ petitions led by M/s Kedia Trading challenged the constitutional
validity of the Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022,
framed under Section 8(c) and Section 62 of ...
M/s Kedia Trading vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others – Chhattisgarh High Court Declares Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022 Ultra Vires
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, including M/s Kedia Trading and
several other traders and manufacturers, challenged the constitutional validity
of the Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022, framed
...
Ramavtar vs State of Rajasthan – Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Denied in NDPS Act Section 8/15 Case; Alleged Possession and Management of Hotel, Witness Statements and Criminal Antecedents Considered
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ramavtar, filed an anticipatory bail
application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.
51/2022, registered at Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur, for
alleged offen...
BLA Projects Private Limited & Ors. vs. Eastern Coalfields Limited & Ors. – GST Liability in Tender Contracts Cannot Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction; Parties Directed to Arbitration | Article 226 of the Constitution of India | Arbitration Clause | GST on Works Contract
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, BLA Projects Private Limited & Others,
challenged a work order issued by Eastern Coalfields Limited (ECL)
concerning the construction of a concrete road for coal transportation. Th...
Marysadan Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Kerala – Kerala High Court Directs Upload of Pending PWD Bills Through Price Software Without Loss of Seniority | GST Revision & Payment Delay
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Marysadan Projects Pvt. Ltd.,
executed road construction works for the Public Works Department (PWD), Kerala,
including the Chalakudy–Vellikulangara Road and flood rectification works...
Smart Byte Technologies vs Union of India & Ors. – GST Refund Rejection Under Section 54(3)(ii) of CGST Act Quashed; Inverted Duty Structure Refund to Be Reconsidered in Light of Circular Dated 06.07.2022 and BMG Informatics Case
Facts of the CaseSmart Byte Technologies, a proprietorship concern,
approached the Karnataka High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India challenging refund rejection orders dated 08.03.2022
pass...
M/s. New Grand Hotel & Another vs. Shenbagam – Madras High Court Allows Condonation of 1598 Days' Delay in Appeal Subject to Withdrawal of 50% Compensation | Employees' Compensation Act, 1923
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, M/s. New Grand Hotel and its
Manager, filed a petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court
seeking condonation of a delay of 1,598 days in filing an appeal against
the ...