Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,603,874
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Amit Chandrakant Shah vs State of Gujarat: Gujarat High Court Quashes Vague GST Registration Cancellation Notice, Restores GSTIN Forthwith and Imposes ₹25,000 Cost on Department

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 236
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Amit Chandrakant Shah, was engaged in the business of trading in gold, silver, building materials and other goods. He was a registered dealer under the Goods and Services Tax law with e...

Vibgyor Drugs Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Connected Matters – Telangana High Court Applies Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. and Disposes GST TRAN-1 Transitional Credit Petitions under Section 140 of the CGST Act read with Rule 117 of the CGST Rules

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 168
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Telangana High Court considered three connected writ petitions concerning transition and availment of pre-GST CENVAT/Input Tax Credit under the GST regime through FORM GST TRAN-1, including request...

Gurprit Singh @ Lali vs State of Bihar: Patna High Court Confirms Bail in Liquor Smuggling Case Involving Misuse of GST E-Way Bills; Records Directed to Be Placed with Niraj Singh Case for Larger Public Interest Action

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 182
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Gurprit Singh @ Lali, approached the Patna High Court in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 137 of 2021 arising from District Gaya.By an earlier order dated 17 May 2022, the petitione...

Vibgyor Drugs Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Connected Matters – Telangana High Court: GST Transitional Credit Claims Under Section 140 CGST Act and Rule 117 CGST Rules to Be Governed by Supreme Court Ruling in Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 178
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Telangana High Court considered three writ petitions involving distinct but connected disputes concerning migration and availment of accumulated CENVAT/Input Tax Credit into the GST regime t...

M/s The National Small Industries Corporation Limited vs The Commissioner, Commercial Tax & GST, Odisha and Others – Orissa High Court Declines Writ Interference Against Appealable GST Order; Consequential Demand Notice Cannot Be Challenged Independently Without Challenging the Underlying Order

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 176
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s The National Small Industries Corporation Limited, Bhubaneswar, approached the Orissa High Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 3920 of 2022. The writ petition contained two prayers....

Genpact India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India and Others – BPO Services Performed on Own Account Are Not “Intermediary Services” Under Section 2(13) of the IGST Act; Export Refund Restored

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 237
Read More »
Facts of the CaseGenpact India Pvt. Ltd., an India-based Business Process Outsourcing service provider registered with the Haryana GST authorities, provided a range of BPO and IT-enabled services to customers in India ...

A.J. Augustine vs State of Kerala & Others – Kerala High Court Directs Disposal of Section 138 NI Act Cheque Dishonour Cases Within Three Months in View of Section 143(3) Mandate

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 223
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, A.J. Augustine, aged 85 years and proprietor of Kerala Trading Company, Nedumkandam, approached the High Court of Kerala by filing three Original Petitions under Article 227 of the Con...

A.J. Augustine vs State of Kerala & Others – Kerala High Court Directs Disposal of Section 138 NI Act Cheque Dishonour Cases Within Three Months in View of Section 143(3) Mandate

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 190
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, A.J. Augustine, aged 85 years and proprietor of Kerala Trading Company, Nedumkandam, approached the Kerala High Court by filing three connected Original Petitions under Article 227 of...

State of Karnataka & Ors. vs M/s Akshaya Agro Sales Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Karnataka High Court Case Law on Filing of TRAN-1 Forms in View of Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. | Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe State of Karnataka, through its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, along with the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, LGSTO-100 and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, preferred a writ...

District Roads and Buildings Officer/Executive Engineer, R&B Department, Medchal-Malkajgiri Division vs Union of India & Others — Telangana High Court Dismisses Writ Against Service Tax Demand on Right of Way and Road-Cutting Permissions as Statutory Appeal Was Not Filed Within Limitation | Sections 65B(44), 65B(51), 66E(a), 73(2), 75, 76, 77(2) & 174

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 180
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner was the District Roads and Buildings Officer/Executive Officer of the Roads and Buildings Department, Medchal-Malkajgiri Division, State of Telangana. The petitioner approached the High...