Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
State of Karnataka vs M/s Akshaya Agro Sales Pvt. Ltd. — TRAN-1 Filing for Transitional Credit; Writ Appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act Disposed of in View of Union of India vs Filco Trade Pvt. Ltd.
Facts of the
CaseThe dispute arose from the issue of permitting the
filing of TRAN-1 forms for claiming or transitioning eligible tax credit
under the GST regime. The State of Karnataka and its tax authorities preferr...
M/s. Simon India Ltd. vs CT & GST Officer, Cuttack II Circle and Another – Orissa High Court Disposes of Application as Withdrawn After Extension of Time for Completion of GST Audit Till 21 December 2022
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Simon India Ltd. was the petitioner before the
High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in W.P.(C) No. 26443 of 2022 against the CT
& GST Officer, Cuttack II Circle and another. The order under consid...
A.J. Augustine vs State of Kerala & Others – Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act Mandates Expeditious Trial of Section 138 Cheque Dishonour Cases; Kerala High Court Directs Disposal Within Three Months
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, A.J. Augustine, aged 85 years and
proprietor of Kerala Trading Company, Nedumkandam, approached the Kerala High
Court by filing three Original Petitions under Article 227 of the Consti...
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu vs M/s Casil Industries Ltd. — Excise Appeal Dismissed as Issue Stood Squarely Covered by Earlier Judgment in CEA No. 10/2020 and Connected Appeals
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu
filed CEA No. 225/2022 against M/s Casil Industries Ltd. before the High Court
of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu.The High Court reco...
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu vs M/s BBF Industries Ltd. (U-II) — Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 — High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment
Facts of the
CaseThe Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise
(J&K), Jammu filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise
Act, 1944 challenging an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Appellate ...
Rajath R vs State of Karnataka – Rule 14 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000: Tender Corrigendum Enhancing GST Certificate Requirement from One Year to Three Years Before Opening of Bids Held Valid
Facts of the CaseThe
petitioner, Rajath R, proprietor of R.R. Enterprises, claimed to be a
registered firm engaged in the supply of food articles. The petitioner had been
supplying readymade food and diet to the Distr...
Hirise Builders and Developers vs State Tax Officer & Commissioner of State Tax – Kerala High Court Directs Determination of Tax Liability for 2022 Amnesty Scheme Where Only Penalty Orders Existed under the Kerala VAT Act
Facts of the
CaseHirise Builders and Developers had suffered orders
imposing penalty for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 under the Kerala
Value Added Tax Act. The petitioner’s case was that there had been n...
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu vs M/s Casil Industries Ltd.: High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by CEA No. 10/2020 under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu
filed Central Excise Appeal No. 224/2022, along with CM Nos. 4647/2022 and
4648/2022, against M/s Casil Industries Ltd. before the High Court...
M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions vs State of Odisha & Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement in Pre-GST Works Contracts; Orissa High Court Directs Consideration Under Revised Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions,
filed the writ petition challenging the action of the State of Odisha and other
opposite parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising fr...
W.P. No. 36440 of 2022 vs State Tax Authorities – Section 62(2) APGST Act: Returns Filed Within 30 Days Require Portal Verification and Fresh Assessment; No Coercive Action Till Reassessment
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court by way of
a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents for not
withdrawing the impugned orders in Form ASMT-13 dated 17.11.2021 relating ...