Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries — Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 — High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order concerning M/s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, EPIP Kartholi...
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs Sun Pharmaceutical Industries – Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 – J&K and Ladakh High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund Following Earlier Coordinate Bench Ruling
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ...
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. — Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 — High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise
Act, 1944 against an order of the Customs, Excise and Serv...
Arvind Kumar vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, GST Bureau of Investigation & Ors. – Calcutta High Court Directs Hearing to Vehicle Owner and Goods Owner Before Grant of Relief in GST Detention Matter | WPA 22468 of 2022 & WPA 22695 of 2022
Facts of the CaseThe matter arose from two connected writ petitions, being W.P.A.
22468 of 2022 and W.P.A. 22695 of 2022, filed before the Calcutta
High Court.The dispute concerned proceedings before the GST auth...
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. — Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944: High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed an
appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu under Section
35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.The dispute arose fr...
Sparsh Soni vs Union of India Through Superintendent, Central GST – Regular Bail Granted in Alleged ₹5.92 Crore Fraudulent ITC Case Under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Sparsh Soni, filed a second bail application
under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking release on regular
bail during the pendency of trial in connection with Crime No....
GST Registration Cancellation Case Law: Petitioner vs Assistant Commissioner, State GST, Sector 1, Kashipur – Restoration Application to Be Considered Liberally on Payment of GST Dues; Speaking Order and Hearing Mandatory
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court by filing WPMS No.
2902 of 2022 challenging proceedings relating to cancellation of GST
registration.The petitioner specifically sought quashing of the show
ca...
M/s Atlantic International Trading Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs Commissioner, Central Excise and Central GST Commissionerate Delhi South and Anr. – Delhi High Court Directs Supply of Relied Upon Documents and Cloning/Return of Seized Electronic Devices Before Reply to Show Cause Notice
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners approached the Delhi High Court in writ
proceedings arising from a Show Cause Notice dated 16 August 2022. The
controversy before the Court concerned the availability and supply of docu...
DS Confectionery Products Limited vs Nirmala Gupta and Anr: Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction Against “PELSE” and “PLUS++” for Infringement of Well-Known “PULSE” Trademark Under Sections 2(1)(zg), 28 and 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999; Awards ₹2 Lakh Damages
Facts of the CaseDS Confectionery Products Limited, the plaintiff, is part of
the Dharampal Satyapal Group and is engaged in diverse business sectors,
including food and beverages and confectionery products. The plaint...
Technovision Surveys & Mapping Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs Chief Engineer (Irrigation & Administration) & Ors. – Kerala High Court Directs Reasoned Decision on GST Reimbursement for Pre-GST Contract Executed After GST Introduction | Article 226
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Technovision Surveys & Mapping Co. Pvt.
Ltd., is a company engaged in the field of survey and mapping. It entered
into an agreement with the second respondent on 16 May 2017 for an
...