Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Balaguru Kathiresan vs The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise – Madras High Court Allows Revival of GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns under Section 29 of the CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Balaguru Kathiresan, challenged the order
cancelling his GST registration bearing GSTN No. 33CVKPK3670H1ZH. The
cancellation order was issued under Reference No. ZA330322026928M dated
...
M/s. Kausalya Infra Projects Private Limited vs Additional Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Others – Telangana High Court: Writ Court Will Not Interfere at GST Show Cause Notice Stage Under Section 74(1) When Adequate Statutory Remedy Is Available
Facts of the CaseM/s. Kausalya Infra Projects Private Limited, formerly known
as Kausalya Shelters Private Limited, approached the Telangana High Court under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a show ...
Sajin Das V M vs Assistant State Tax Officer & Ors. – Kerala High Court Dismisses GST Writ Petition as Withdrawn with Liberty to File Fresh Petition | Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sajin Das V M, aged 31 years and
proprietor of Tanvi Jewellery, approached the High Court of Kerala by
filing WP(C) No. 19498 of 2021.The respondents included officers of the State Good...
M/s Atlantic International Trading Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs Commissioner, Central Excise and Central GST Commissionerate Delhi South and Anr. — Delhi High Court Directs Supply of Seized Documents and Cloning/Return of Electronic Devices Before Reply to Show Cause Notice
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Atlantic International Trading Pvt.
Ltd. and Ors., along with petitioners in the connected matters concerning M/s
Blue Star International Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. and M/s Sunflame Trad...
M/s. HSIL Limited – Packaging Products Division vs Union of India & Others — Challenge to ₹1.07 Crore GST Interest Recovery for Delayed GSTR-3B Filing and Transitional Credit; Writ Petition Dismissed as Withdrawn
Facts of the CaseM/s. HSIL Limited – Packaging Products Division filed a writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the
Telangana High Court challenging a letter dated 22.04.2019, followed by...
Tvl. Bagavathiamman Magalir Sangam Vs. The State Tax Officer: Principles of Natural Justice and Quashing of Ex-Parte GST Assessment Order Passed under Section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act 2017 due to Technical Issues and Portal-Only Notifications
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Tvl. Bagavathiamman Magalir Sangam, represented by its
Secretary K. Rajammal, is located in Dindigul, Tamil Nadu.
The
respondent, the State Tax Officer, Vedasandur...
M/s Rishav Enterprises Vs Union of India & Others: Jharkhand High Court Disposes Writ Petition Granting Liberty to Appeal Order Before the GST Appellate Tribunal Under Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s Rishav Enterprises, is a proprietary concern managed by
its proprietor, Smt. Rakhi Agarwal, operating from Jamshedpur, District
East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
The
...
M/s. Punjabi Restaurant Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of CGST and C.Ex: Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order and Bank Attachment Issued Against Sole Proprietorship for Dues Incurred by a Predecessor Partnership Firm Under Article 226
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner's Identity: The petitioner is M/s. Punjabi
Restaurant, situated in Madurai, currently represented by its sole
proprietor, P. Sudha.
The
Impugned Order: The re...
Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Commissionerate vs M/s. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd. – CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods Used in Captive Power Plant Allowed Despite Sale of 75% Surplus Power to Another Unit | Section 2(e), Rule 57AA and Rule 2
Facts of the CaseM/s. Konark Met Coke Ltd. (“KMCL”) established a Metallurgical
Coke Plant along with a Captive Power Plant (“CPP”). The CPP was intended to
generate electricity for consumption connected with K...
Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Commissionerate vs M/s. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd. – CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods Used in Captive Power Plant Allowed Despite Sale of 75% Surplus Power to Another Unit | Section 2(e), Rule 57AA and Rule 2
Facts of the CaseM/s. Konark Met Coke Ltd. (“KMCL”) established a Metallurgical
Coke Plant along with a Captive Power Plant (“CPP”). The CPP was intended to
generate electricity for consumption connected with K...