Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shekhar Rajan Prasad: Scope of Section 14 and Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016 Regarding Alteration of Sanctioned Plans, Allocation of Alternate Commercial Spaces, and Interest Liability on Delayed Possession under Consent Terms Before the Bombay High Court
Facts of the Case
The
Agreement: On January 24, 2013, Moongipa Realty Pvt.
Ltd. (formerly known as Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant/Promoter)
entered into seven registered Agreements for Sale w...
The Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate vs. M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd. (TISCO): Orissa High Court Dismisses Tax Appeals In Light of Precedent Ruling under Central Excise Act and Service Tax Rules
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, The Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax,
Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate, preferred multiple tax appeals before the
High Court of Orissa.
The
...
M/s. Deepak Steel & Power Limited vs. State of Odisha & Another | High Court of Orissa Dismisses Writ Petition W.P.(C). No. 5696 of 2014 for Non-Prosecution Due to Lack of Instructions Under Central Sales Tax (CST) and Odisha Value Added Tax (OVAT) Assessment Dispute
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, M/s. Deepak Steel & Power Limited, had preferred a
Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the
High Court of Orissa at Cuttack.
The...
The Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate vs. M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd. (TISCO) | Dismissal of Central Excise Appeals by Orissa High Court under Orissa Tax Appellate Civil Law in Alignment with Co-Related Precedent Orders
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant in this case is the Revenue Department, represented by The
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Bhubaneswar-I
Commissionerate.
The
Respondent...
Datum Micro Credit vs State Bank of India: Legality of Freezing Bank Accounts Under Section 91 CrPC and Mandatory Seizure Compliance Under Section 102 CrPC—Orissa High Court Judgement
Facts of the Case
Corporate
Identity & Agreement: The Petitioner, M/s Datum
Micro Credit, is a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies
Act, 1956. It functions as a Service Provider ...
M/s. Geet Basa vs. The CT & GST Officer & Others: High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous Upon Petitioner’s Voluntary Memo Under Article 226 of the Constitution
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, M/s. Geet Basa, filed a writ petition docketed as W.P.(C). No.
24032 of 2019 before the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa at Cuttack.
The
petition challenged an action,...
Akash Sharma vs. State of Haryana: High Court Rejects Bail in Multi-Crore Crypto-Hawala Scam Involving the 'WinMoney' Application and Terror-Linked Witness Intimidation under CrPC and Prize Chits Banning Act
Facts of the Case
The
Fraudulent Scheme: The case originated from a formal
complaint by an investor who was contacted via Telegram and induced to
invest in an Android-based application named "WinMoney...
M/s. Hitanshi Sales vs. The Sales Tax Officer, Sambalpur-I Circle & Another | Quashing of Impugned Sales Tax Notices and Assessment Orders Under Orissa Value Added Tax (OVAT) Act In Light of M/s. Keshab Automobiles and M/s. Rathi Steel and Power Limited Interpretations
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, M/s. Hitanshi Sales, approached the High Court of
Orissa via Writ Petition (Civil) No. 17868 of 2017.
The
writ petition challenged the legal validity of certain im...
M/s. Hotel Indraprastha (Formerly Hotel Sun Beam) Vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Special Circle), State GST Department & Others: High Court of Kerala Directs Stay of Coercive Revenue Recovery Proceedings Under KGST Act Pending Adjudication of First Appeal
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s. Hotel Indraprastha (formerly known as Hotel Sun Beam), is
a partnership firm engaged in business operations in Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala.
The
petitione...
Bengal Peerless Housing Development Company Limited Vs. West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling & Ors. — Whether Preferential Location Services (PLS) and Right to Use Car Parking Space Constitute a Composite Supply with Construction Services under Section 2(30) and Section 8 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017
Facts of the Case
The
Parties Involved: The petitioner, M/s Bengal Peerless
Housing Development Company Limited (BPHDCL), is a housing development
entity that approached the West Bengal Authority for ...