Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,589,905
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs Indian Vaccines Corporation Ltd. – Taxability of Interest Earned from Portfolio Management Scheme During Pre-Operative Period under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 201
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee company was incorporated for manufacturing human vaccines using technology developed by Pasteur Merieux Serums et Vaccines, France. The company received substantial financial grants ...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/S Leroy Somer & Controls (India) Pvt. Ltd.: Delhi HC on Pre-requisites of Section 271G Penalty & Rule 10D Compliance

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 280
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Profile & Filing: The respondent-assessee entered into international transactions, utilizing Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) comparability for export sales and the T...

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs Indian Vaccines Corporation Ltd. – Taxability of Interest Earned from Portfolio Management Scheme During Pre-Operative Period under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 219
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee company was incorporated for manufacturing human vaccines using technology developed by Pasteur Merieux Serums et Vaccines, France. The company received substantial financial grants ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs. DCM Limited: Can Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Be Imposed For Making an Erroneous Legal Claim During Scrutiny Assessment When All Material Facts Are Disclosed?

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 234
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent/assessee (DCM Limited) filed its original return for the Assessment Year 2002-03, which was subsequently revised multiple times. During the pending scrutiny assessm...

Raghav Bahl Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Validity of Proceedings under Sections 158BD & 158BE of the Income-tax Act Where Satisfaction Was Recorded Beyond Statutory Limitation Period

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 227
Read More »
Facts of the Case A search operation under the Income-tax Act was conducted against Mr. Manoj Aggarwal on 03.08.2000. Block assessment proceedings of the searched person were completed under Sectio...

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XI vs. GOKUL CHAND HARI CHAND Allowability of Machinery Maintenance Expenses as Current Repairs under Section 31(i) vs. Capital Expenditure and Rejection of Remand Plea against Cryptic Assessment Order

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 198
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Business: The respondent-assessee operated a stone crusher unit at Faridabad. Expenditure Claimed: During the Assessment Year 2008-09, the assessee claimed a deduct...

Speciality Food India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, ITA No. 51/2014, Delhi High Court (2014:DHC:1302-DB): Whether Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be Levied for a Bona Fide and Debatable Depreciation Claim

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 200
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Speciality Food India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the composite business of manufacturing and trading food products intended for human and animal consumption. Manufact...

CIT vs. Sam Global Securities Ltd. | Plenary Appellate Powers vs. Procedural Restrictions under Section 139(5)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 244
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02 on October 31, 2001, declaring a taxable income of ₹1,72,910. Subsequently, a notice for scrutiny asse...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Handicrafts and Handlooms Export Corpn. of India Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 201
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The Parties: The Appellant is the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) , and the Respondent-Assessee is M/s Handicrafts and Handlooms Export Corporation of India Ltd., a Govern...

M/s Comfort Living Hotels Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax–III | Delhi High Court | Revenue Expenditure vs Capital Expenditure on Hotel Renovation and Allowability of 100% Depreciation on Temporary Construction

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 247
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company was engaged in the hospitality business and operated a hotel. During Assessment Year 1989–90, it claimed an amount of ₹10,30,253 towards building repairs and related expenses. ...