Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,589,954
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

M/s. Usha Micro Process Controls Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Deductibility of Customs Redemption Fine under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 249
Read More »
Facts of the Case Import of Software: During the Assessment Year 1985-86, the appellant imported hardware along with certain software. Customs Dispute: The appellant declared and sought to re...

AT&T Communication Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-I & Another – Special Audit under Section 142(2A) of Income Tax Act: Validity of Direction, Complexity of Accounts and Scope of Judicial Review

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 218
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, AT&T Communication Services India Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T Communication Services International Inc., USA, was engaged in market research and administrative ...

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. AIRLINE ALLIED SERVICES LTD.: Validity of Spreading Government Grants Over Lease Period Under AS-12 and Section 145 of the Income Tax Act.

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 258
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The Grant Issue: The respondent-assessee (Airline Allied Services Ltd.) received a sanctioned grant of ₹35 crores from the Ministry of Finance and Company Affairs aimed at im...

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. & Sony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. – Delhi High Court on Illegal Garnishee Proceedings under Sections 220(3) and 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 259
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Sony India Pvt. Ltd. were engaged in importing, marketing, selling consumer products and providing after-sales support services in India.For Assessment ...

Kahan Udyog Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Scope of Additions for Unexplained Expenditure under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 245
Read More »
 Facts of the Case Search Operations: On 16th November 1995, search operations under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were conducted at the business premises of Mahavir Woolen Mills, whic...

Sony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Sony India Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Another – Attachment of Bank Accounts under Section 226(3) of Income Tax Act During Pendency of Stay Applications

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 241
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Sony India Pvt. Ltd. were engaged in importing, distributing, and selling consumer electronic products and mobile devices in India.For Assessment Year 2...

M/s York Exports (P) Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-III, Extension of Time under Section 80HHC(2)(a) for Realisation of Export Proceeds due to Reasons Beyond Control

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 247
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Profile: The petitioner, M/s York Exports (P) Limited, is a limited company engaged in the manufacture and export of woolen and cotton hosiery goods. Export Specifi...

Woodward Governor India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Legality and Quantum of Warranty Provision Deductions under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 235
Read More »
 Facts of the Case Appellate and Assessment Year: The appellant, Woodward Governor India Ltd., filed an appeal concerning the Assessment Year 2006-07. Disallowance of Expenses: The Income Tax ...

M/s Kostub Investment Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax – Allowability of Employee Higher Education Expenses as Business Expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 349
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Kostub Investment Ltd., filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2006–07 declaring losses under the normal provisions and book profits under Section 115JB of the Income...

INCOME TAX LITIGATION: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S PRAKASH TUBES LIMITED — MODE OF COMPUTATION OF BOOK PROFITS AND CARRY FORWARD OF UNABSORBED LOSSES UNDER SECTION 115-J

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 279
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, a limited company, filed its income tax return for the Assessment Year 1989-90 declaring an income of ₹91,25,683 under Section 115-J of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The as...