Mechanical Approval under Section 153D and Additions Based on Dumb Documents Invalid: ITAT Allahabad Decides Group Search Cases in ACIT vs Vijay Stone Product, Sonebhadra (AYs 2005-06 to 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 03.02.2011 in the Ramji Vaish Group, which included Vijay Stone Product, M/s Subhash Stone Product (P) ...

Cash Deposits Treated as Unexplained under Section 69A Upheld: ITAT Allahabad Dismisses Appeal in Sangam Eanta Udyog vs NFAC, Delhi (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 106
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm engaged in brick kiln business, did not file its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16. Reassessment proceedings were initiated under section 147 of the Income-...

Addition under Section 50C/43CA Without Valuation Cell Reference Set Aside: ITAT Allahabad Restores Assessment and Penalty in H.K. Infraventure Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, Central Circle (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company sold two flats during Assessment Year 2015-16 at values lower than the circle rate. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961...

Addition under Section 50C Without Valuation Reference Not Sustainable: ITAT Allahabad Restores Matter in H. K. Infraventure Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT / CIT(A), NFAC (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company sold two flats during Assessment Year 2015-16 at prices lower than the circle rate. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) and made an addition of ₹...

Ex-Parte Reassessment and Penalty Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice: ITAT Allahabad Restores Quantum and Penalty Issues for Fresh Adjudication – Shervani Sugar Syndicate Ltd. (AY 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shervani Sugar Syndicate Limited, was subjected to reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessing Officer passed an ex-parte reassessment order dated 16.12.2019 unde...

Ex-Parte Assessment and Appellate Order Set Aside for Violation of Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Restores Matter for De Novo Assessment – Ramanand Gupta vs ITO (AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, was subjected to assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2017-18. The Assessing Officer passed an ex-parte assessment order dated 19.12.2019 under section 144 of the In...

Ex-Parte Appellate Order Set Aside for Lack of Opportunity: ITAT Allahabad Restores Additions under Sections 68, 69, 40A(3) for De Novo Assessment – Manglam Service Station vs ACIT (AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the business of trading of petrol and diesel as a dealer of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 declar...

Dismissal of Appeal on Limitation Set Aside Applying Liberal Approach to “Sufficient Cause”: ITAT Allahabad Restores Appeal Relying on Katiji Principle – Jiyauddin Khan vs ITO (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the learned CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Yea...

Partial Relief by CIT(A) Set Aside for Lack of Opportunity and Non-Compliance with Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Restores Matter for De Novo Speaking Order – Vikas Rastogi vs DCIT (AY 2013-14)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2013-14 declaring total income of ₹18,25,030. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 196...

Protective Addition Under Section 68 Cannot Be Converted into Substantive Addition Without Due Process: ITAT Allahabad Deletes Double Taxation of Unsecured Loans – M/s Divya Construction Co. vs DCIT (AY 2013-14)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm engaged in construction activities, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2013-14. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 19...