Reopening under Sections 147/148 Invalid for Borrowed Satisfaction; Assessing Officer Must Independently Apply Mind and Establish Live Link with Tangible Material: Well Trans Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Well Trans Logistics India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the business of freight forwarding. It filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 on 30.09.2011. The assessment was soug...

Final Assessment Order Time-Barred under Section 144C(4) Even Where DRP Objections Filed Belatedly; Limitation Is Mandatory and Absolute: CIT (International Taxation)-2 vs. Mavenir UK Holdings (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 05.01.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2013-14. The ITAT had ...

Reopening Valid Where Original Return Was Processed Under Section 143(1) and Tangible Material Exists – Delhi High Court in R P Foam Home (P) Ltd. v. ACIT

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged a notice dated 27 March 2018 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2011-12.The petitioner contended that t...

Assessment and Reassessment in Name of Amalgamating Entity is Void Ab Initio – Delhi High Court in Qualcomm India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThis writ petition formed part of a large batch of matters challenging assessment and reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department in the name of entities that had ceased to exist p...

Reassessment Notice Invalid for Want of Sanction by Competent Authority under Section 151 – Delhi High Court in Prashant Softwares Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT & Ors.

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThis batch of writ petitions, including Prashant Softwares Pvt. Ltd., challenged reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-16. The reas...

TPO Cannot Determine ALP of Royalty at NIL by Questioning Commercial Expediency – Delhi High Court in PCIT-7, Delhi v. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 17 October 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the case of Sony India Pvt....

Mandatory Issuance of Draft Assessment Order under Section 144C Even in Section 153C Proceedings – Delhi High Court in PCIT-7 v. Wickwood Development Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Wickwood Development Ltd., is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 22 Marc...

Failure to Issue Draft Assessment Order under Section 144C in Remand Proceedings Renders Final Assessment Void – Delhi High Court in PCIT-7 v. Sumitomo Corporation India (P) Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CasThe Revenue filed an appeal challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 28 September 2021, whereby the ITAT upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) sett...

Assessment and Reassessment Proceedings Against an Amalgamating (Non-Existent) Company Are Void Ab Initio: Delhi High Court Applies Maruti Suzuki Doctrine in Paytm Mobile Solutions Case

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the CasePaytm Mobile Solutions Private Limited, which had merged into One 97 Communications Limited pursuant to a sanctioned scheme of amalgamation, was one of the petitioners in a large batch of writ petiti...

Reassessment Notices Issued After Limitation by Relying on Abhisar Buildwell Are Invalid: Delhi High Court Quashes Time-Barred Section 148 Proceedings in Param Dairy Ltd Case

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
Facts of the CaseParam Dairy Ltd. was one of the petitioners in a batch of writ petitions challenging reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2012–13.Th...