M/s Addichem Speciality LLP & Ors. vs Commissioner of GST & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2025) – Limitation under Section 107 CGST Act and Condonation of Delay

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of writ petitions arose from orders passed by the Appellate Authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, whereby the appeals filed by the petitioners were dismissed s...

M/s Addichem Speciality LLP & Ors. vs Special Commissioner I, Department of Trade and Taxes & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2025) [Condonation of Delay under Section 107 CGST Act – Appellate Authority & High Court Jurisdiction]

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of writ petitions arose from multiple orders passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act dismissing appeals filed by various assessees on the ground of limitat...

M/s Addichem Speciality LLP vs Special Commissioner-I, Department of Trade & Taxes & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2025) [GST Appeal Limitation | Section 107 CGST Act | Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration | Natural Justice]

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
Facts of the Case Petitioners were registered entities under GST but failed to file returns due to circumstances such as COVID-19 disruptions and administrative issues. Show Cause Notices (SCNs) we...

Principal Commissioner, Central Tax, GST Delhi West vs M/s Alkarma – Scope of Adjudication after Quashing of Show Cause Notice under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, M/s Alkarma, was engaged in fabrication and installation services related to building structures and was registered under the Service Tax regime. The Respondent availed CENVAT credit du...

Tata Teleservices Limited vs Commissioner CGST Delhi East & Anr. – Double Taxation on Prepaid Telecom Services & Maintainability of Writ under Article 226

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Tata Teleservices Limited, is a telecom service provider offering cellular services, SMS, internet/data services, and Value-Added Services (VAS).The dispute arises from taxation on prep...

M/s Kashish Optics Ltd. vs Commissioner, CGST Delhi West & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2025) – Seizure Beyond 12 Months Invalid Without Notice under Section 67(7) CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s Kashish Optics Ltd., challenged the continued retention of goods seized by the GST authorities pursuant to a search conducted on 22/23 October 2020, followed by a seizure order date...

Paras Products & Ors. vs Commissioner, Central GST Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2025) – Inordinate Delay in Adjudication Vitiates Proceedings under Central Excise Law

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of writ petitions involved Paras Products, Sai Enterprises, and Jaina Polymers, who challenged Orders-in-Original dated 30.12.2022 and 02.03.2023 passed by the Central GST authoritie...

Paras Products & Ors. vs Commissioner, Central GST, Delhi & Ors. (2025) – Inordinate Delay in Adjudication Vitiates SCN Proceedings under Central Excise Act

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the Case Petitioners (Paras Products, Sai Enterprises, and Jaina Polymers) were engaged in manufacturing footwear and soles. Searches were conducted on 29.04.2011, and goods including fini...

Paras Products & Ors. vs Commissioner Central GST Delhi & Anr. (2025) – Delhi High Court Quashes 11-Year Delay in Adjudication under Central Excise Law

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Paras Products, Sai Enterprises, and Jaina Polymers, were engaged in the manufacture of footwear and soles falling under Chapter Headings 6402 and 6406 of the Central Excise Tar...

MS Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner CGST Delhi North (2025) – Delhi High Court | Inordinate Delay in Adjudication Violates Natural Justice; SCNs Quashed under Section 73 Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, MS Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd., challenged an Order dated 23.08.2024 whereby the Respondent imposed: Service Tax Liability: ₹30,68,03,113/- Interest and Pena...