FOLLOW FOR MORE UPDATES, WORD OF WISDOM, SEMINAR UPDATES, SEBI UPDATES, INCOME TAX LAW, & GST FAQS UPDATES.

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
13/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 379
Read More »
FOLLOW FOR MORE UPDATES:- GLOBALCA (Click here to view) FOR JOBS (Click here to view)   SEMINAR UPDATE:- Karol Bagh CPE Study Circle of NIRC of ICAI Seminar will be held at 5:00 PM on Monday, 15th D...

New Income Tax Return (ITR) Forms under Income-tax Act, 2025 – Lok Sabha Clarification on Timeline and Simplification

Author
My Tax Expert
13/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 533
Read More »
 The Income-tax Return (ITR) forms pertaining to the first tax year 2026–27 shall be notified prior to Financial Year 2027–28, since the ITR forms relating to the Income-tax Act, 2025 would require consequent...

Commissioner must follow binding jurisdictional HC precedent despite SC pendency; sec. 264 revision allowed: HC, Shangri-La International Hotel Management Pte. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (International Tax) - [2025] (Delhi)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 395
Read More »
Commissioner must follow binding jurisdictional High Court precedent despite pendency before Supreme Court; revision under section 264 allowableShangri-La International Hotel Management Pte. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Incom...

Reassessment Quashed Due to Non-issuance of Section 143(2) Notice — Foundational Infirmity; Bangalore ITAT Relies on PCIT v. Shri Jai Shiv Shankar Traders

Author
My Tax Expert
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 637
Read More »
In a significant ruling, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench, has quashed reassessment orders passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 on account of non-issuance of notice under Section 143(2)...

Delhi High Court Upholds PCIT-Only Sanction for High-Value Tax Evasion Prosecution: Collegium Approval Not Required Under CBDT Circulars

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 526
Read More »
Saumya Chaurasia v. Union of India & OthersDelhi High Court | WP(C) 8191/2025 | Dec 8, 2025** 1. Core Issue:-Whether, for prosecution under Section 276C(1) (wilful attempt to evade tax) and Section 278E (pre...

Kerala High Court: Section 10(23BBA) Exemption Restricted to Statutory Managing Bodies, Not to Administered Religious or Charitable Institutions

Author
My Tax Expert
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 514
Read More »
The Kerala High Court has dismissed the assessee’s writ petitions, holding that the exemption under section 10(23BBA) applies exclusively to bodies and authorities constituted, established, or appointed under a Central...

ITAT Kolkata Remands Assessment: Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed Without Allowing Expenditure Even if Section 10(23C)(iiiab) Exemption Is Denied, University of North Bengal v. DCIT, Exemption (2025) (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 325
Read More »
The assessee, a university, claimed exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) and accordingly did not file its return of income. Since no return was filed, the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 requiring t...

Deletion of Section 68 Penny Stock LTCG Addition in Section 153A Assessment Absent Incriminating Material: Mumbai ITAT Follows Abhisar Buildwell

Author
My Tax Expert
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 435
Read More »
Deletes Section 68 addition on penny stock LTCG in Section 153A assessment sans incriminating materialMumbai ITAT deletes addition under Section 68 on account of long term capital gain on alleged penny stocks of listed c...

Filing of audit report mandatory but timeline merely procedural; Allows deduction under section 80IAC

Author
My Tax Expert
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 525
Read More »
Filing of audit report mandatory but timeline merely procedural; Allows deduction under section 80IACDelhi ITAT allows Assessee’s appeal observing that the filing of Audit Report is mandatory for claiming deduction und...

Failure to consider judicial precedents not rectifiable under section 254(2); Upholds ITAT’s refusal to rectify

Author
My Tax Expert
12/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 368
Read More »
Failure to consider judicial precedents not rectifiable under section 254(2); Upholds ITAT’s refusal to rectifyTelangana High Court dismisses Assessee’s writ petition on finding that there is no infirmity in the ITAT...