Delay Due to Counsel’s Negligence Should Not Defeat Substantive Justice — ITAT Allahabad Restores Salary Case for Statutory Deductions in Anurag Jaiswal vs. ITO-2(1), Allahabad (ITA No.77/ALLD/2024, AY 2020-21)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 272
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a medical professional employed at King George’s Medical University, originally filed a return declaring income of ₹9,48,020 and claiming refund of excess TDS. Subsequently, on advice...

No Addition for Alleged Suppressed Production Without Rejection of Books or Evidence of Unaccounted Sales — ITAT Allahabad Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal in DCIT/ACIT Central Circle vs. M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 260
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) deleting additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged suppression of production for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13.The Asse...

Additions for Alleged Suppressed Production Unsustainable Without Concrete Evidence — ITAT Allahabad Upholds Deletion in ACIT/DCIT Central Circle, Allahabad vs. M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 285
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals challenging the orders of the CIT(A) which had deleted substantial additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged suppression of production in the assessee’s ...

Cash Deposits from Presumptive Business Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained When Similar Income Accepted in Earlier Years — ITAT Allahabad Applies Consistency Principle in Amit Chopra vs. ITO-1(1), Allahabad (ITA No.34/ALLD/2024, AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 484
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBased on AIR information, the Department found that the assessee had deposited ₹35,17,115 in a savings bank account but had not originally filed a return of income for the relevant year. Reassessment...

Ex-Parte Dismissal by NFAC Without Considering Physical Submissions & Remand Report Violates Natural Justice — ITAT Allahabad Restores Appeal in Rohit vs. ITO, Ambedkar Nagar (ITA No.102/ALLD/2024, AY 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 278
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A), NFAC, which had arisen from a best-judgment assessment under section 144. The appeal before the Tribunal itself was delayed by 692 days. The...

Bank Account Linked to PAN but Belonging to Proprietorship of Father — Additions for Cash Deposits Set Aside for Verification: ITAT Allahabad in Rahul Sharma vs. ITO Ward-3(2), Mirzapur (ITA No.98/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 256
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee did not file a return for the relevant year. Information was received regarding substantial deposits in a current bank account maintained with Punjab National Bank in the name of “Sri Ra...

Interactive Session on Labour Codes

Author
My Tax Expert
15/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 860
Read More »
Video Recordinghttps://youtu.be/vwHbdCz1o00PPThttps://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1771133014_PPTNewLabourcodesCASunilKumarcompressed.pdf  MY TAX EXPERT – Interactive Session on Labour CodesJoin us on 14 Februar...

Appeal Dismissed for Inordinate Delay Without Sufficient Cause — ITAT Allahabad in Shalimar Powerloom Textiles vs. ITO, Ward-1(5), Allahabad (AY 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 401
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shalimar Powerloom Textiles, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Allahabad, dated 01.10.2019 for Assess...

Addition for Cash Deposits under Section 69A Set Aside as NFAC Ex-Parte Order Restored — Surendra Kumar vs. ITO-2(3), Allahabad (ITAT Allahabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 350
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBased on information available in the Individual Transaction Statement (ITS), the Income Tax Department discovered that the assessee had deposited ₹47,00,000 in a bank account during the relevant yea...

CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Without Deciding Legal Grounds — ITAT Allahabad Restores Section 56(2)(x) Agricultural Land Case in Rajman vs. ITO Ward-3, Ambedkar Nagar (ITA No.79/ALLD/2024, AY 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 381
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s case was selected for limited scrutiny under the e-Assessment Scheme, 2019 regarding investment in immovable property purchased below stamp duty value. The assessee had acquired three ...