Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Golden Infracon Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 1715/2010): Admissibility and Genuineness of Valid Business Expenditures or Job Work Charges Erroneously and Inadvertently Debited Under an Incorrect Accounting Head of Commission Account Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed its income tax return, claiming certain expenditures incurred for business purposes. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that an...

Fab India Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Scope of Revision under Section 263, Transfer Pricing Reference to TPO, and Distinction Between Lack of Inquiry and Inadequate Inquiry

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Fab India Overseas Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in export and local trading of handloom products and readymade garments. For Assessment Year 2004-05, it filed its return declaring inco...

CIT v. Smt. Deepa Singhal: Application of Peak Credit Theory to Bank Deposits and Restricting Additions to Peak Balance under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) discovered multiple cash deposits totaling ₹25.73 lakhs in the Savings Bank Account maintained by the assessee with Canara Bank. Due to a...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. [Assessee] – Whether UPS is Eligible for 60% Depreciation as Part of Computer System or Only 25% as Power Supply Equipment | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee purchased and used UPS devices along with its computer systems. Depreciation at the rate of 60% was claimed on UPS by treating it as part of the computer system. The Asses...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Visual Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. – Whether Section 10B Benefit for a Profit-Making Unit Can Be Claimed Without Adjusting Losses of Another Unit of the Same Assessee: Delhi High Court Remands Matter to ITAT for Adjudication on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the treatment of tax benefits claimed by the assessee under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The assess...

Director of Income Tax vs Brahmaputra Capital Financial Services Ltd. | Interest on NPA Not Taxable on Accrual Basis for NBFCs | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Brahmaputra Capital Financial Services Ltd., was a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC). It had advanced interest-bearing loans aggregating approximately ₹13.57 crore to ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Padmini Technologies Ltd.: Scope of Section 68 Unexplained Cash Credits in Reassessment – Deletion of Additions Based on Final Findings of Customs

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the Case The regular assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year (AY) 1997-98 was completed for the assessee, M/s Padmini Technologies Ltd., on March 31, 200...

Delhi High Court Ruling on Section 271(1)(c) Penalty and Section 45(5)(b) Inchoate Rights: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Smt. Bimla Devi (2010:DHC:11371-DB) — Evaluating Deferment of Capital Gains Tax on Disputed Enhanced Land Acquisition Compensation and the Pre-2009 Debatable Legal Position Under the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Smt. Bimla Devi, was an individual whose ancestral agricultural lands (originally belonging to her mother) were compulsorily acquired by the State of Haryana under the provisio...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee | Comprehensive Delhi High Court Ruling on Non-Disallowance of Delayed ESI and PF Statutory Contributions Deposited Within Allowed Grace Period Prior to the Filing of Income Tax Return Under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant (Revenue) challenged the actions of the assessee regarding the timing of statutory deposits. The assessee had made payments towards Employee State Insurance (ESI) and Provident Fund (PF) ...

Director of Income Tax vs. Brahmaputra Capital Financial Services Ltd. (2011) 2011:DHC:2801-DB | Interest on NPA Not Taxable on Accrual Basis for NBFCs Under Real Income Theory

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Brahmaputra Capital Financial Services Ltd., a registered Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), had advanced interest-bearing loans aggregating to approximately ₹13.57 crores to certain...