Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
834,148
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Anuj Bansal (Delhi High Court) – Section 153D Approval Held Invalid Due to Non-Application of Mind | AY 2017-18

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 155
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the order dated 31.10.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for AY 2017–18.The Tribunal had earlier annulled the...

Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-IX, New Delhi & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd., filed a settlement application before the Income Tax Settlement Commission concerning Assessment Years 2012–13 to 2016–17.The Commission re...

Dinesh Dahiya vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-20 | Delhi High Court | Section 68, 147, 148 Income Tax Act | Unexplained Cash Deposit & Presumptive Income on Share Trading

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, did not file his Return of Income (ROI) for Assessment Year 2011–12. Subsequently, the Income Tax Department identified cash deposits amounting to ₹10,51,885/- in h...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs Standard Chartered Grindlays Pty Ltd (Delhi High Court) – Expenses Attributable to Indian Business Not Covered Under Section 44C

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2003–04, wherein the Revenue challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed certain expe...

Subodh Gupta vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Assessment Orders Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice in Virtual Hearing

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 180
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Subodh Gupta, challenged assessment orders for Assessment Years 2015–16 and 2016–17. The challenge was limited to violation of principles of natural justice. Show cause noti...

Subodh Gupta vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Assessment Orders Set Aside Due to Breach of Natural Justice in Video Conferencing Hearing [Sections 143(3), Principles of Natural Justice]

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 196
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Subodh Gupta, filed writ petitions concerning Assessment Years 2015–16 and 2016–17 challenging assessment orders dated 30.05.2023 and 31.05.2023 passed by the Assessing Officer.The ...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3, Delhi vs Hike Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Revenue vs Capital Expenditure | Section 143(3) | AY 2013-14 & 2014-15

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 367
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Hike Private Limited, filed its return declaring substantial losses for AY 2014-15. The case was selected for scrutiny, and assessment was completed under Section ...

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/s Azure Retreat Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 68, 143(3), 153A/153B & 260A – Condonation of Delay & Deletion of Share Capital Addition

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 332
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.The case pertains to Assess...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3, Delhi vs Hike Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Revenue vs Capital Expenditure | Sections 28 & 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 196
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Hike Private Limited, filed its return declaring substantial losses. The Assessing Officer (AO), during scrutiny under Section 143(3), disallowed expenses of â...

Rakesh Kumar Mohindroo vs Income Tax Officer Ward 59(3), Delhi & Anr. – Challenge to Reassessment Proceedings u/s 148A & 148 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
08/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2019–20, wherein the petitioner challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department.The challenge was specifically ma...