Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,205,177
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

No Addition for Alleged Suppressed Production Without Rejection of Books or Evidence of Unaccounted Sales — ITAT Allahabad Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal in DCIT/ACIT Central Circle vs. M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 408
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) deleting additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged suppression of production for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13.The Asse...

Additions for Alleged Suppressed Production Unsustainable Without Concrete Evidence — ITAT Allahabad Upholds Deletion in ACIT/DCIT Central Circle, Allahabad vs. M/s Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar (AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 431
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals challenging the orders of the CIT(A) which had deleted substantial additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged suppression of production in the assessee’s ...

Cash Deposits from Presumptive Business Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained When Similar Income Accepted in Earlier Years — ITAT Allahabad Applies Consistency Principle in Amit Chopra vs. ITO-1(1), Allahabad (ITA No.34/ALLD/2024, AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 818
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBased on AIR information, the Department found that the assessee had deposited ₹35,17,115 in a savings bank account but had not originally filed a return of income for the relevant year. Reassessment...

Ex-Parte Dismissal by NFAC Without Considering Physical Submissions & Remand Report Violates Natural Justice — ITAT Allahabad Restores Appeal in Rohit vs. ITO, Ambedkar Nagar (ITA No.102/ALLD/2024, AY 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 417
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A), NFAC, which had arisen from a best-judgment assessment under section 144. The appeal before the Tribunal itself was delayed by 692 days. The...

Bank Account Linked to PAN but Belonging to Proprietorship of Father — Additions for Cash Deposits Set Aside for Verification: ITAT Allahabad in Rahul Sharma vs. ITO Ward-3(2), Mirzapur (ITA No.98/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 396
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee did not file a return for the relevant year. Information was received regarding substantial deposits in a current bank account maintained with Punjab National Bank in the name of “Sri Ra...

Appeal Dismissed for Inordinate Delay Without Sufficient Cause — ITAT Allahabad in Shalimar Powerloom Textiles vs. ITO, Ward-1(5), Allahabad (AY 2012-13)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 524
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shalimar Powerloom Textiles, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Allahabad, dated 01.10.2019 for Assess...

Addition for Cash Deposits under Section 69A Set Aside as NFAC Ex-Parte Order Restored — Surendra Kumar vs. ITO-2(3), Allahabad (ITAT Allahabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 481
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBased on information available in the Individual Transaction Statement (ITS), the Income Tax Department discovered that the assessee had deposited ₹47,00,000 in a bank account during the relevant yea...

CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Without Deciding Legal Grounds — ITAT Allahabad Restores Section 56(2)(x) Agricultural Land Case in Rajman vs. ITO Ward-3, Ambedkar Nagar (ITA No.79/ALLD/2024, AY 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 530
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s case was selected for limited scrutiny under the e-Assessment Scheme, 2019 regarding investment in immovable property purchased below stamp duty value. The assessee had acquired three ...

Ex-Parte NFAC Order Confirming Section 68 Addition Set Aside — ITAT Allahabad Restores Appeal in Ramdas vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Allahabad (AY 2014-15)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 456
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual engaged in the civil construction business, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2014-15 declaring total income of ₹20,91,500. The Assessing Officer issued notic...

Presumptive Tax under Section 44AE Upheld for Truck Income but Commission Deposits Remanded — ITAT Allahabad in Dilshad Husain vs. ACIT, Circle-1, Allahabad (AYs 2009-10 & 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 480
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a small transport dealer, filed returns showing modest income from plying trucks. Information from AIR indicated substantial cash deposits in his bank account. For Assessment Year 2009-10...