Ex-Parte and Non-Speaking Appellate Order Violative of Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside CIT(A) Order Passed Under Faceless Regime – Ram Lakhan Maurya vs Assessment Unit (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring total income of ₹2,41,890. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 147 read with se...

Whether Sumptuary allowance granted to judicial officer is exempt from payment of Income Tax?

Author
Ram Dutt Sharma
13/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 827
Read More »
Whether Sumptuary allowance granted to judicial officer is exempt from payment of Income Tax?The sumptuary allowance is a specific benefit provided to judicial officers in India to cover entertainment expenses. This allo...

Tie breaker Rule in Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA): Determination of Tax Residence in Dual Residency Cases with Key Judicial Precedents

Author
Ram Dutt Sharma
03/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1154
Read More »
Tie breaker Rule in Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)The Tie breaker rule for residential status refers to the criteria used to determine an individual’s primary place of residence, usually for tax purpos...

Appeal Maintainable Despite Low Tax Effect Due to Accommodation Entry Exception: Delhi High Court in Pr. CIT-1 v. Agroha Fincap Ltd. (ITA No. 60/2024, 23.12.2025)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
29/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 291
Read More »
Delhi High Court:-Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 VersusM/s Agroha Fincap Ltd.ITA No. 60/2024 | Judgment dated: 23 December 2025 CORE ISSUE:-Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue before the High Court was m...

ITR-U Under Section 139(8A): A Costly Last Resort After 31st December for Missed Belated and Revised Returns

Author
CA DR VINAY MITTAL
29/12/2025  |  1 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1176
Read More »
ITR-U: The High-Cost Compliance Window Beyond 31st DecemberA taxpayer who misses the 31st December deadline for filing a belated or revised return exits the normal compliance cycle. The only remaining recourse thereafter...

Supreme Court on Section 44C: DIT (Intl. Tax), Mumbai v. American Express Bank Ltd. – Cap on Head Office Expenditure for Non-Residents Reaffirmed (Judgment dated 15.12.2025)

Author
Ram Dutt Sharma
25/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 566
Read More »
Analysis of judgement of Supreme Court delivered on 15.12.2025 in the case of Director of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/s American Express Bank Ltd., on the issue of Deduction of head office expenditure in the case of non-resi...

Schedule FA Disclosure in ITR Explained: Foreign Assets, ESOPs, RSUs, Dividends & Penalties under Black Money Act | Complete Compliance Guide

Author
CA. Churchill Jain
24/12/2025  |  2 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1703
Read More »
Schedule FA (Foreign Assets) is mandatory for Resident & Ordinarily Resident (ROR) individuals who hold any foreign asset or foreign income at any time during the relevant financial year, even if: Asset is d...

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
23/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 686
Read More »
Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 Sections 44 and 45Penalty Provisions – Statutory Exclusions, Monetary Thresholds and ESOP Amendment 1. Overview:-The Black...

Alleged Bogus Purchases: Deletion vs Remand Depends on Charging Provision — ITAT Delhi Deletes Addition u/s 69, ITAT Pune Orders Remand u/s 37 | KDP Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Taparia Tools Ltd. (2025)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 553
Read More »
Alleged Bogus Purchases – Divergent Legal Treatment Case 1:M/s KDP Infrastructure Private Limited v. DCITITAT Delhi | ITA No. 1094/Del/2024 | Order dated 12.12.2025 Case 2:ACIT, Circle-1 v. Taparia Tools ...

Who is eligible to claim depreciation in a lease transaction - Whether the lessor (person who hires or leases the asset for a consideration) or the lessee (who hires for business use) ?

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
03/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 813
Read More »
Who is eligible to claim depreciation in a lease transaction - Whether the lessor (person who hires or leases the asset for a consideration) or the lessee (who hires for business use) ? As per income tax Act, 1961,...