Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Dheeraj Kumar & 4 Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Allahabad High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Copyright Infringement Case Involving Alleged Sale of Pirated Spark Plugs under Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act and Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Facts of the CaseThe applicants filed an anticipatory bail
application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Case Crime No. 16 of
2020 registered under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act at Police Station
...
Hariom Gupta & Another vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Anticipatory Bail Granted in Copyright Infringement Case Involving Alleged Sale of Pirated Spark Plugs | Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957 | Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Facts of the
CaseThe applicants, Hariom Gupta and Ramkumar
Sharma, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Case Crime
No. 16 of 202...
Jigneshbhai Vasantlal Shah through Pritiben Jigneshbhai Shah vs District Magistrate, Surat – Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential Commodities Act for Non-Supply of Legible Documents and Non-Consideration of Representation | Articles 21 & 22 of the Constitution of India, Section 3 of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, Sections 3 & 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners challenged the preventive detention
orders dated 26.04.2022 issued by the District Magistrate, Surat under
the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential
Comm...
M/s. R.P.M. Associates vs Goods and Services Tax Network & Others – Jharkhand High Court Allows Filing of GST TRAN-1 in View of Supreme Court Directions in Filco Trade Centre Case | Transitional Input Tax Credit | Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. R.P.M. Associates,
approached the Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities
to permit filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward eligible
transitional in...
M/s. R.P.M. Pharma vs Goods and Services Tax Network & Others – Jharkhand High Court Allows Filing of GST TRAN-1 for Transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC) in Light of Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. | Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. R.P.M. Pharma,
approached the Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities
to permit filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward transitional
input tax credi...
Kishan Gupta vs. Goods and Services Tax Network & Others – Jharkhand High Court Permits Filing of GST TRAN-1 for Transitional Input Tax Credit in Light of Supreme Court's Filco Trade Centre Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kishan Gupta, approached the
Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities to permit the
filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward eligible transitional
input ta...
M/s. Ujjain Steel Processors vs. State of Jharkhand & Others – Jharkhand High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Without Personal Hearing or Supply of Relied-Upon Documents | Sections 73 & 75 of the JGST Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Ujjain Steel Processors,
a registered partnership firm engaged in the trading of iron and steel,
purchased goods from M/s. Maa Kali Steel, a registered GST dealer during
March 20...
Himaliyan Enterprises Pulwama vs State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others – Jammu & Kashmir High Court Holds Writ Petition Not Maintainable Due to Availability of Statutory Alternative Remedy under Section 12-D of the J&K General Sales Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Himaliyan Enterprises Pulwama,
challenged three orders before the High Court:
Assessment Order dated 03.02.2011 passed by the Assessing
Authority, Check Post Lowermunda;
Appell...
Jigneshbhai Vasantlal Shah Through Pritiben Jigneshbhai Shah vs District Magistrate, Surat – Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention under Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act for Non-Supply of Legible Documents and Non-Consideration of Representation | Sections 3 & 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 & Articles 21, 22 and 226 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the CaseThe petitions were filed before the Gujarat High
Court challenging preventive detention orders dated 26.04.2022 passed by the
District Magistrate, Surat under the Prevention of Black Marketing and
Mai...
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Bolpur Commissionerate vs M/s Shyam Steel Industries Limited – Calcutta High Court Upholds CENVAT Credit on Concessional CVD Paid on Imported Coal under Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus.
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, M/s Shyam Steel Industries Limited,
is engaged in the manufacture of Sponge Iron, Billets and TMT Bars. During the
departmental audit for FY 2013-14, the department alleged that the ass...