Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions vs State of Jharkhand — Differential GST Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts to Be Decided Under SOP dated 26.08.2022, Preferably Within 8 Weeks
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed before the
Jharkhand High Court by contractors and infrastructure entities whose works
contracts had been awarded during the pre-GST regime and remained subsisting o...
M/s SPK and Co vs State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer — Madras High Court Keeps Section 74 TNGST Assessment and Bank Attachment Action in Abeyance on 18% GST over ₹23.70 Lakh Seigniorage Fee Pending Supreme Court Decision in Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry vs Union of India
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s SPK and Co, represented by its
Joint Managing Partner, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The writ petition sought ...
M/s Anasurya Traders vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Transmission Belting Qualifies for Tax Exemption Under Section 8 of the APGST Act Despite Entry 101 / Item 12 of the Sixth Schedule
Facts
of the CaseM/s
Anasurya Traders was a registered dealer on the rolls of the Commercial Tax
Officer, Main Bazar, Guntur, carrying on business in V-belts, transmission
belts and related goods. The dispute concern...
M/s Anasurya Traders vs State of Andhra Pradesh – Transmission Belting Classified as Cotton Fabric Exempt from Sales Tax under Section 8 of the APGST Act Despite Entry 101 / Item 12 Tax Rate
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Anasurya Traders, Guntur, was a
registered dealer on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Main Bazar,
Guntur, and was engaged in the business of V-Belts, Transmission Belts and
...
R. Murugan vs Commissioner/Additional Chief Secretary, Commercial Tax Department & Another – Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Objections to GST Demand on Seigniorage Fee and Restrains Recovery Pending Disposal | Article 226 | CGST/TNGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, R. Murugan, was carrying on quarry
operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil Nadu
Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. The licence/permit had been granted...
M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam Man Power Services vs State Tax Officer (FAC) — Madras High Court Grants Conditional Remand of Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B IGST Mismatch and Disputed Waste Management Service Exemption; 25% Tax Deposit Directed
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam
Man Power Services, represented by its Director, approached the Madurai
Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of
...
M/s Shri Kalyan Marbles vs Union of India & Others – Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Levy on Mining Royalty, Following Consistent Precedents on Legislative Competence
Facts of the CaseM/s Shri Kalyan Marbles, through its proprietor Smt. Meena
Devi Sahu, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court challenging
the levy of Goods and Services Tax on royalty. The principal reli...
M/s Harihara Putra Bottle Supplies vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Others — Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73(9) KGST Adjudication Orders on GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A Discrepancy and Ineligible ITC; Fresh Adjudication Ordered Subject to ₹10,000 Cost for Each Year
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Harihara Putra Bottle Supplies,
approached the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, challenging adjudication orders passed by the
Commer...
Tvl. P. Rengasamy vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 — Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 74 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-7 Mismatch; 23% Recovery Treated as Sufficient Condition for Remand
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. P. Rengasamy, a works contractor,
approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India challenging an assessment order dated 18 July...
Petitioner(s) in WPMB No. 9 of 2026 & Connected Matters vs State of Uttarakhand – Sections 63, 73, 74 and 169 Uttarakhand GST Act – Mere Uploading of GST Notices on Portal After Cancellation of Registration Insufficient; Proceedings Permitted from Show Cause Notice Stage: Uttarakhand High Court
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions involving common questions of fact
and law came before the Division Bench of the Uttarakhand High Court. The
petitions were clubbed together and decided by a common judgment.F...