Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
M/s Golden Globe Infra Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) & Another – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Composite GST Assessment Order for FY 2020-21 to 2022-23; Separate Proceedings Required Under Sections 73 and 74 of GST Act
Facts of the CaseM/s Golden Globe Infra Private Limited, a
registered person under the GST regime, was served with an Order-in-Original
dated 04 February 2026, bearing DIN 3704022668299, passed by the
first respondent...
Vaitlas Infra vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Absence of DIN; Section 73 Assessment Remanded Subject to 20% Deposit of Disputed Tax
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vaitlas Infra, approached
the Andhra Pradesh High Court challenging an assessment order passed by the
first respondent on 26 April 2024 for the financial year 2018-19
under Section 73 ...
Shri M.N. Kumar vs Principal Commissioner of Central Tax — Karnataka High Court Quashes Delayed Adjudication Order for Violation of Natural Justice and CBEC Circular dated 10.03.2017
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Shri M.N. Kumar, approached the
Karnataka High Court challenging Order-in-Original No. 20/2021-22 dated
17.12.2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax.A Show Cause Noti...
Brigade Enterprises Limited & Others vs State of Karnataka & Others – Karnataka High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Under Section 482 CrPC; Forcible Re-entry, Breaking Open Locks and Sale of Lessee’s Movables Prima Facie Attract Sections 441, 447, 425, 427, 424 and 406 IPC
Facts of the CaseBrigade Enterprises Limited, the first petitioner,
had developed Orion Avenue Mall at Banaswadi Main Road, Bengaluru. The second
respondent, M/s Suraapana Brewing LLP, entered into a commercial arrange...
Mrs V A Nirmala Mary vs Union of India & Others – GST Proceedings Initiated Against Deceased Person Set Aside for Fresh Reconsideration | Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Mrs V A Nirmala Mary, approached
the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
India seeking quashing of the following proceedings issued by Respondent ...
Mrs V A Nirmala Mary vs Union of India & Others – GST Proceedings Initiated Against Deceased Person Set Aside for Fresh Reconsideration | Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Mrs V A Nirmala Mary, approached
the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
India seeking quashing of the following proceedings issued by Respondent ...
District Collector and District Commissioner, Bellary & Anr. vs Shri K. Nagaraja — Karnataka High Court on Sections 6A and 6C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Clauses 8, 28, 31 & 34 of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985: Immediate Confiscation for Godown Address Violation Held Drastic and Unjustified
Facts of the
CaseThe State authorities filed a writ appeal
challenging the order dated 14 December 2021 passed in W.P. No. 104417/2021.
The writ petitioner, Shri K. Nagaraja, proprietor of a fertilizer and pesticide
...
Tvl. Muthu Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Tuticorin-II Circle – GST Registration Cancellation: Madras High Court Orders Revival on Suguna Cutpiece Terms for Non-Filing of GSTR-3B Returns
Facts of the CaseTvl. Muthu Enterprises filed a writ petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the
Madras High Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.The p...
Sahil Gupta vs State of Punjab: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail Under Sections 22, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act; Section 37 Rigour Relaxed for First-Time Offender Named Only in Co-Accused’s Disclosure Statement Without Recovery
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sahil Gupta, approached the High
Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in
connection with FIR No. 116 dated 04.06.2022, registered under Sections 2...
Anmol Granites vs Union of India & Others – GST on Mining Royalty: Rajasthan High Court Rejects Challenge to Levy of GST on Royalty Following Sudarshan Lal Gupta Case
Facts of the CaseAnmol Granites, through its authorised signatory
partner Shri Vinod Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court
at Jodhpur challenging the impugned orders/notice issued by the responde...