Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,671,627
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

C. Sumathi vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Chokkikulam Assessment Circle, Madurai – GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns | Revocation of GST Registration under Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 | Madras High Cour

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 212
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled by the Proper Officer with effect from 31.07.2022 under Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 on the ground that GST returns had not been filed continuously...

M/s. Yentop Manickam Edible Oils Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Ocean Freight Service Tax Refund; Directs Fresh Examination in Light of Mohit Minerals Judgment | Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 229
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Yentop Manickam Edible Oils Private Limited, had paid service tax on ocean freight under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for the month of May 2017.Subsequently, relying upon the...

M/s. Yentop Manickavel Sons Edible Oils Pvt. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Ocean Freight Service Tax Refund; Directs Reconsideration in Light of Mohit Minerals Judgment | Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 201
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Yentop Manickavel Sons Edible Oils Private Limited, had paid service tax on ocean freight under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for the month of June 2017. Subsequently, it fil...

Mumbai Furniture, Bisra Road, Rourkela vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Odisha & Others – Orissa High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Appearance of Petitioner | Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 193
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mumbai Furniture, Bisra Road, Rourkela, had filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging proceedings involving the Commi...

M/s. Damas Kaushal Food and Beverages vs The Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-I & Others – Orissa High Court Permits Withdrawal of Writ Petition; Petition Dismissed as Withdrawn | Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 193
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s. Damas Kaushal Food and Beverages filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-I and other authorities. ...

M/s Yentop Manickam Edible Oils Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Ocean Freight Service Tax Refund, Orders Fresh Consideration in Light of Mohit Minerals Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Yentop Manickam Edible Oils Private Limited, had paid service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on ocean freight for the month of June 2017. Subsequently, the petitioner ...

M/s. Manickavel Edible Oils Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Ocean Freight Service Tax Refund Claim, Orders Fresh Examination in Light of Mohit Minerals Judgment | Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 207
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Manickavel Edible Oils Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original dated 13.10.2022, whereby the respondent rejected its refund claim for service tax...

Premananda Sahoo vs State of Odisha – Orissa High Court Holds Onerous Cash Security Cannot Be Imposed for Release of Seized Goods; Property Security Directed Instead under Sections 457 & 482 Cr.P.C. in GST Evasion Allegations

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 183
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the order passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Puri, whereby the seized scrap copper wires were directed to be released in his favour. However, the release was made subject to the ...

Sankar Lal Sahoo vs State of Odisha – Orissa High Court Remands Matter for Fresh Inquiry on Release of Seized Iron Scrap under Section 457 Cr.P.C.; Ownership Cannot Be Rejected Solely for Absence of E-Way Bill

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 211
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sankar Lal Sahoo, challenged the order dated 02.09.2020 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Panposh, Rourkela in Criminal Misc. Case No. 166 of 2020 whereby his application under Section 4...

M/s Contractor vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Release of Pending Contractor Bills with 12% Interest for Completed Government Work | Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Clauses 68 & 69 of AP Standard Specifications

Author
My Tax Expert
15/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 189
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a registered civil contractor, was awarded the work of construction of "Sampradayam Kala Gurukulam at Kallepalli Village" through the e-tender process pursuant to Agreement No. 01/JNTU...