Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu vs M/s BBF Industries Ltd. (U-II) — Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 — High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment
Facts of the
CaseThe Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise
(J&K), Jammu filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise
Act, 1944 challenging an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Appellate ...
Rajath R vs State of Karnataka – Rule 14 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000: Tender Corrigendum Enhancing GST Certificate Requirement from One Year to Three Years Before Opening of Bids Held Valid
Facts of the CaseThe
petitioner, Rajath R, proprietor of R.R. Enterprises, claimed to be a
registered firm engaged in the supply of food articles. The petitioner had been
supplying readymade food and diet to the Distr...
Hirise Builders and Developers vs State Tax Officer & Commissioner of State Tax – Kerala High Court Directs Determination of Tax Liability for 2022 Amnesty Scheme Where Only Penalty Orders Existed under the Kerala VAT Act
Facts of the
CaseHirise Builders and Developers had suffered orders
imposing penalty for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 under the Kerala
Value Added Tax Act. The petitioner’s case was that there had been n...
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu vs M/s Casil Industries Ltd.: High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by CEA No. 10/2020 under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu
filed Central Excise Appeal No. 224/2022, along with CM Nos. 4647/2022 and
4648/2022, against M/s Casil Industries Ltd. before the High Court...
M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions vs State of Odisha & Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement in Pre-GST Works Contracts; Orissa High Court Directs Consideration Under Revised Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions,
filed the writ petition challenging the action of the State of Odisha and other
opposite parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising fr...
W.P. No. 36440 of 2022 vs State Tax Authorities – Section 62(2) APGST Act: Returns Filed Within 30 Days Require Portal Verification and Fresh Assessment; No Coercive Action Till Reassessment
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court by way of
a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents for not
withdrawing the impugned orders in Form ASMT-13 dated 17.11.2021 relating ...
Raju Sakthivel vs CBI – Bail Granted Under Section 439 CrPC in Section 120B IPC Read With Sections 7 and 7A Prevention of Corruption Act Case; Non-Compliance With Sections 41 and 41A CrPC Held Contrary to Arnesh Kumar and Satender Kumar Antil
Facts of the
CaseThe accused-petitioner, Raju Sakthivel,
filed an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
seeking regular bail in connection with CBI ACB Guwahati RC 7(A)
2022/CBI-GWH.The case...
D.B.S. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Bihar & Ors. – Patna High Court Directs Decision on Contractor’s Pending Dues, EPF and VAT/GST Deduction Refund Claims Within Two Months; Section 89 CPC and Bihar State Litigation Policy Applied
Facts of the CaseD.B.S. Constructions Pvt. Ltd., a registered contractor,
claimed to have carried out maintenance work under the “Operation and Minor
Maintenance Work of Shirkhinda SHP (2 × 350 KW)” pursuant to an...
Software Development Company vs State Authorities – Government Directed to Pay ₹47.03 Lakh for 11 Android Applications; Payment Rejection Memo Set Aside as Delay Was Attributable to Respondents, Not Developer
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner was a company engaged in the
business of software development, data processing and digitalization.In 2016, respondent No. 2 requested the petitioner
company to develop 11 Android softwa...
Green Fizz Beverages Private Limited vs State of West Bengal & Others – GST Classification Dispute of Carbonated Beverage With Fruit Juice vs Carbonated Beverage | Writ Petition Restored Despite 3½-Year Delay Due to Non-Constitution of GST Tribunal; Conditional 20% Deposit and Bond Directed
Facts of the
CaseGreen Fizz Beverages Private Limited, the writ
petitioner and appellant, filed an intra-court appeal against the order dated 18.07.2022
passed in W.P.A. No. 15484 of 2022.The original writ petition ch...