Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,866,202
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Vidit Jain vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) – Addition under Section 68 for Cash Deposits, Cash Withdrawals and Gift from In-Laws | Scope of Interference under Section 260A of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 285
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return declaring total income of ₹6,92,424/- comprising salary income, rental income, interest income and dividend income. During scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing...

Oriflame India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection under Section 92A & Rule 10B of Income Tax Rules

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 373
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Oriflame India Private Limited, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Oriflame Investments Limited, Mauritius, engaged in the business of distribution and sale of cosmetic products through a di...

Oriflame India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing Adjustment and Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 284
Read More »
Facts of the CaseOriflame India Private Limited preferred multiple connected appeals against different tax authorities, namely the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, and Additional...

Oriflame India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Connected Appeals | Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing | RPM vs TNMM | Comparable Selection under Section 92C & Rule 10B of Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 341
Read More »
Facts of the CaseOriflame India Private Limited, engaged in the import and sale of cosmetic and personal care products, filed returns for the relevant assessment years and furnished transfer pricing documentation for i...

Oriflame India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection under Section 92A & Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 348
Read More »
Facts of the CaseOriflame India Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Oriflame Investments Limited, Mauritius, was engaged in direct selling and distribution of cosmetic products in India through consultants.Fo...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax–2 vs M/s ChrysCapital Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. & Connected Appeals (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection under Sections 92CA & 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 310
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning determination of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) under S...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs ChrysCapital Ltd. & Anr. | Delhi High Court | ITA 346/2018 & ITA 349/2018 | Dismissal of Revenue Appeals Referring Earlier Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 274
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter involves two appeals filed by the Revenue, namely: ITA 346/2018: PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs ChrysCapital Ltd. ITA 349/2018: Pro Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs...

Oriental Bank of Commerce vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Appeals Allowed with Reference to Connected Judgment (ITA 129/2018)

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 304
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Oriental Bank of Commerce, along with its Central Accounts Office, filed appeals before the Delhi High Court against orders passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. The matte...

Oriental Bank of Commerce vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Appeals Allowed with Reference to Connected Judgment (ITA 129/2018)

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 309
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Oriental Bank of Commerce, filed multiple income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed by the tax authorities. The matters were connected with similar issues ...

Oriental Bank of Commerce vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Software Expenditure Held as Revenue Expenditure under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
01/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 254
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Oriental Bank of Commerce, incurred expenditure on acquisition of various categories of software for its banking operations during the relevant assessment years. The Assessing Officer (AO...