Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,210,588
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Chhattisgarh High Court Directs State PMGSY Authorities and NRIDA to Decide Contractor's Representation for GST Reimbursement Within 60 Days in M/s Kushwaha Construction Company vs State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. (WPC No. 1019 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 23
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s Kushwaha Construction Company, a road-construction contracting firm registered at Shantinagar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh, through its Director Shri Dilip Kumar Kushwa...

Calcutta High Court Sets Aside GST Refund Rejection Founded on Limitation, Applies Supreme Court's Covid-19 Limitation Extension, Directs Fresh Decision on Merits Within Eight Weeks in Md. Ershad Alam vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge & Ors. (W.P.A. 2301 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Md. Ershad Alam, challenged two orders dated 24th December, 2020 and 18th November, 2021 passed by the respondent GST authority — the Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax,...

Allahabad High Court Holds Pre-Deposit Under Section 107(6)(b) UPGST Act Is 10% of Disputed Tax Amount, Not Total Disputed Amount; Sets Aside First Appellate Order in M/S Durga Rai Vijay Kumar, Samour Bazar vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others (Writ Tax No. 460 of 2020)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 15
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Durga Rai Vijay Kumar, Samour Bazar, was subjected to an original order dated 22.11.2017 passed by the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, First Unit, Chandauli, under the ...

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) Dismisses Challenge to GST Recovery on Temple Auction Tender, Holds Successful Bidder Who Participated Cannot Resist Tax Condition, Directs Section 54 Refund Route if Exemption Applies — K.Veerapathiran vs The Commissioner, HR&CE (W.P.(MD) No.3128 of 2018)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 14
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner participated in a tender-cum-auction, dated 25.01.2018, conducted by the 4th respondent, Arulmigu Kottai Mariamman Thirukovil, Dindigul, for allotment of a stall to sell "Delhi Appalam...

Gujarat High Court Declines to Interfere With Form GST MOV-11 Confiscation Orders Citing Statutory Appeal Under Section 107, Clarifies Provisional Release Under Section 67(6) Remains Available Pending Appeal — M/S SS Enterprise vs Commissioner of State Taxes (C/SCA/3800/2022 with SCA Nos. 3834, 3835, 3836, 3838 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 17
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/S SS Enterprise and four connected writ-applicants challenged individual orders of confiscation of goods and conveyance passed against them in Form GST MOV-11 by the concerned authority under the G...

Gujarat High Court Quashes Unreasoned Rule 86A Order Blocking Rs.97.17 Lakh Input Tax Credit, Holds Recording of Reasons and Post-Decisional Hearing Are Mandatory Safeguards — M/s New Nalbandh Traders vs State of Gujarat & 2 others (R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17202 of 2021)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, a proprietary concern trading in M.S. Scrap for over 13 years, purchased scrap from its supplier, M/s. Anmol Enterprise, between 22.12.2020 and 27.03.2021, against tax invoices, weigh...

Calcutta High Court Grants Liberty to Claim Transitional Input Tax Credit via GSTR-3B Following TRAN-1 Portal Glitch, Applying Das Auto Centre Precedent Under Section 140 GST Law — M/s. RSD Natural Resources Pvt. Ltd. vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (W.P.A. 1904 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 19
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s. RSD Natural Resources Pvt. Ltd. sought a direction permitting it to file Form GST TRAN-1 to carry forward, into its electronic credit ledger, transitional credit of Value Added Tax, Central Exci...

Gujarat High Court Orders Release of Detained Areca Nut Consignment Worth Rs.63.70 Lakh Under Section 129 CGST Act on Deposit of Tax and Penalty, Declines to Quash Detention Order at This Stage — Sreejith K. vs State of Gujarat (R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19116 of 2021 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2022 and R/SCA NO. 3640 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 18
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, proprietor of M/s. Sridev Traders, Rajkot, trades in Areca Nuts and was registered with GST on 06.10.2021. It had placed an order for 24,500 kg of Areca Nuts worth Rs.63,70,000 with i...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Immediate Disbursal of Rs.1.44 Crore GST Refund Under Section 56 CGST Act, Where Entitlement Was Undisputed but Payment Was Stuck at CFMS Level — Bharti Airtel Limited vs State of Andhra Pradesh (WRIT PETITION No.182 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 18
Read More »
Facts of the Case Bharti Airtel Limited (GSTIN 37AAACB2894G1ZM), a telecom operator registered at Visakhapatnam, had multiple refund applications sanctioned by the department vide Form GST RFD-06 orders dated 12.01.20...

Allahabad High Court Quashes Time-Barred Rejection of Section 107 GST Appeal, Holds Limitation Period Stood Suspended Under COVID-19 Orders of the Supreme Court — M/S J.K Infratech vs Additional Commissioner (WRIT TAX No. 76 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/08/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/S J.K Infratech's GST registration was cancelled by an ex-parte order dated 17.9.2019 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Sector-3, Commercial Tax, Sonbhadra, on the basis of a notice claimed to ...