Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
District Collector and District Commissioner, Bellary & Anr. vs Shri K. Nagaraja — Karnataka High Court on Sections 6A and 6C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Clauses 8, 28, 31 & 34 of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985: Immediate Confiscation for Godown Address Violation Held Drastic and Unjustified
Facts of the
CaseThe State authorities filed a writ appeal
challenging the order dated 14 December 2021 passed in W.P. No. 104417/2021.
The writ petitioner, Shri K. Nagaraja, proprietor of a fertilizer and pesticide
...
Tvl. Muthu Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Tuticorin-II Circle – GST Registration Cancellation: Madras High Court Orders Revival on Suguna Cutpiece Terms for Non-Filing of GSTR-3B Returns
Facts of the CaseTvl. Muthu Enterprises filed a writ petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the
Madras High Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.The p...
Sahil Gupta vs State of Punjab: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail Under Sections 22, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act; Section 37 Rigour Relaxed for First-Time Offender Named Only in Co-Accused’s Disclosure Statement Without Recovery
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sahil Gupta, approached the High
Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in
connection with FIR No. 116 dated 04.06.2022, registered under Sections 2...
Anmol Granites vs Union of India & Others – GST on Mining Royalty: Rajasthan High Court Rejects Challenge to Levy of GST on Royalty Following Sudarshan Lal Gupta Case
Facts of the CaseAnmol Granites, through its authorised signatory
partner Shri Vinod Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court
at Jodhpur challenging the impugned orders/notice issued by the responde...
Gemar Lollen & Anr. vs State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors. — Gauhati High Court Permits Representation Under Section 80 of SGST Act for Instalment Payment of GST Interest Demanded Under Section 73
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Gemar Lollen and M/s M. L.
Enterprise, approached the Gauhati High Court by filing a writ petition seeking
setting aside of the notice dated 12 September 2022 issued by the
Superinte...
M/s Hariom Mines and Minerals vs Union of India & Others – GST on Mining Royalty: Rajasthan High Court Rejects Challenge to GST Levy Following Sudarshan Lal Gupta; Writ Petition Dismissed
Facts of the CaseM/s Hariom Mines and Minerals, through its partner
Mr. Hemendra Kalal, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court at
Jodhpur challenging the impugned orders/notice issued by the respondent
...
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, DEHRADUN AND ANOTHER VS. PATANJALI AYURVEDA LTD.: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND MANDATES FULL ADJUSTMENT OF PRE-DEPOSITS PAID UNDER PROTEST TOWARDS INTEREST UNDER SABKA VISHWAS (LEGACY DISPUTE RESOLUTION) SCHEME, 2019 READ WITH SECTION 124(2) OF THE FINANCE ACT, 2019
Facts of the Case
Pre-Deposit
Under Protest: On or about January 18, 2014, the respondent-assessee,
Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd., deposited an amount of ₹12,99,42,605/- toward
Central Excise Duty and an ...
Gauhati University vs Union of India & Ors.: Gauhati High Court Allows Impleadment of UGC as Necessary Party in Finance Act, 1994 Demand and Penalty Dispute
Facts of the
CaseGauhati University, a State University established
under the Gauhati University Act, 1947, had instituted the connected writ
petition, being WP(C) No. 5055 of 2022.The subject matter of the writ petit...
Land Acquisition Officer, SRSP, Special Deputy Collector vs Bukya Janu & Others — Telangana High Court Reduces Market Value from ₹75,000 to ₹70,000 per Acre under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Facts of the
CaseThe dispute arose from acquisition of lands
belonging to the respondents-claimants, measuring approximately Ac.18.37½
guntas, situated at Singaram, Munagaveedu and Guindemrajupally Villages,
Mahabub...
Gurmukh Singh vs Union of India & Commissioner, Central GST – Rajasthan High Court Directs Decision on Pending Representation Within One Month Under Article 226
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Gurmukh Singh, Director of
M/s Amar Pratap Steels Pvt. Ltd., filed a civil writ petition before the
Rajasthan High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner h...