Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sri Krishna Agencies,
represented by its proprietor Sri Potharaju Venkataramana, approached the High
Court challenging the assessment order passed by the first respondent on
25.06....
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Shri K. Nagaraja, proprietor of a
fertilizer dealership, possessed a valid authorization under the Fertilizer
(Control) Order, 1985 for carrying on the business of retail sale of
ferti...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Pohtireddy Venkata Reddy, was a
registered person under the GST law. The petitioner was served with an
Order-in-Original dated 24.09.2025 bearing DIN3724092549061 by the first
responde...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner’s GST registration had been
cancelled by an order dated 29.07.2021.Thereafter, on 15.09.2021, the petitioner filed an
application seeking revocation of cancellation of GST registratio...
Facts of the CaseM/s Golden Globe Infra Private Limited, a
registered person under the GST regime, was served with an Order-in-Original
dated 04 February 2026, bearing DIN 3704022668299, passed by the
first respondent...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vaitlas Infra, approached
the Andhra Pradesh High Court challenging an assessment order passed by the
first respondent on 26 April 2024 for the financial year 2018-19
under Section 73 ...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Shri M.N. Kumar, approached the
Karnataka High Court challenging Order-in-Original No. 20/2021-22 dated
17.12.2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax.A Show Cause Noti...
Facts of the CaseBrigade Enterprises Limited, the first petitioner,
had developed Orion Avenue Mall at Banaswadi Main Road, Bengaluru. The second
respondent, M/s Suraapana Brewing LLP, entered into a commercial arrange...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Mrs V A Nirmala Mary, approached
the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
India seeking quashing of the following proceedings issued by Respondent ...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Mrs V A Nirmala Mary, approached
the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
India seeking quashing of the following proceedings issued by Respondent ...