Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,762,571
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) Condones 290-Day Delay in Filing GST Appeal on Parity With Coordinate Bench Rulings, Remits for Adjudication on Merits — Prudential Properties vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals) (WP No. 202518 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Prudential Properties, a GST-registered partnership firm, was issued a show cause notice dated 22.12.2023 for FY 2018-19 proposing a demand of GST on electricity, HVAC, and DG charg...

Punjab and Haryana High Court Holds Retired Partner Remains Liable for Firm's GST Dues Absent Written Intimation of Retirement to the Commissioner Under Section 90 CGST Act — Harvinder Singh vs State of Punjab and Others (CWP-9172-2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the Case Harvinder Singh sought quashing of a summoning order dated 20.02.2025 issued by the Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assistant Collector, calling upon him and other partners of M/s Foreigners Auto Zone ...

Karnataka High Court Quashes Section 50 Interest Demand on Tax Already Paid Through Electronic Cash and Credit Ledgers, Follows Bangalore International Airport Ruling — Eureka Forbes Limited vs Union of India (WP No. 6869 of 2020)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 98
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Eureka Forbes Limited, challenged a notice dated 07.02.2020 (Order No. 04/DRC07/SD3) and consequent recovery in Form GST DRC-07, demanding Rs. 42,68,333/- towards interest on delaye...

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 74 CGST Order Passed Without Notice, Restores Registration, Orders Refund of Penalty Component Only Since Business Was Discontinued — Applicate IT Solutions Pvt Ltd (WP No. 16970 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case Applicate IT Solutions Pvt Ltd challenged an order bearing No. 21/2024-25 dated 30.04.2024 passed under Section 74 of the CGST Act by the Superintendent of Central Excise and Central Tax, contending it...

Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Order Where Personal Hearing Date Preceded the Reply Filing Date, Enforces Commissioner's Office Memo on Sequencing, Follows Mahaveer Trading Company — New Anmol Communication Centre vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 1278 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S New Anmol Communication Centre, through its proprietor Azmat Ali, challenged an order dated 20.08.2024 passed under the GST Act, along with an appellate order dated 24.10.2025 dismi...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Absence of DIN Number, Following Pradeep Goyal (Supreme Court) — Mopati Chandra Sekhar Reddy vs The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others (Writ Petition No. 13384 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the Case Mopati Chandra Sekhar Reddy was served with an assessment order dated 29.10.2024, passed under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for the period 2022-2023, in FORM GST DRC-07 (Ref. No. ZD3710240180611...

Madras High Court Grants Bathurallam and Co. Opportunity to Contest Section 73 GSTR-3B/2A Mismatch Assessment on Condition of 25% Pre-Deposit — (W.P(MD) No. 15587 of 2026)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
Facts of the Case Bathurallam and Co., represented by its proprietor Shahul Hameed, challenged an ex parte assessment order dated 24.12.2025 passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 for the assessment year 2021-22...

Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration of GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns on Compliance With Rule 22(4) CGST Rules, Computes Fresh Section 73(10) Limitation — Adventurers Abode Tourism vs Union of India (WP(C)/5443/2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Adventurers Abode Tourism Private Limited, an event management assessee registered under CGST/AGST (GSTIN 18AAUCA6434B1ZL), was served a show cause notice dated 11.10.2023 for non-filin...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Orders Lacking DIN and Personal Hearing, Remands on 25% Deposit Following Sri Veeranjaneya Pulverisers — M/S Goodwill Agencies vs State of Andhra Pradesh (WP Nos. 17862, 17865 & 17867 of 2026)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s Goodwill Agencies, a partnership firm dealing in motorcycles and parts, was assessed to GST for three consecutive years (2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23) by assessment orders all dated 30.12.2024. It ...

Madras High Court Keeps GST-on-Seigniorage-Fee Proceedings in Abeyance Pending Supreme Court Ruling, Directs 10% Security Deposit — R.R. Construction vs Deputy State Tax Officer (W.P.(MD) No. 32119 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, R.R. Construction, represented by its partner R. Saravanan, challenged a notice dated 09.10.2025 (referenced in the order as 19.10.2025) levying GST on the Seigniorage Fee/Royalty and D...