Facts of the Case
DHFL was a housing finance company listed on the National Stock Exchange
(NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).
NFRA initiated an Audit Quality Review after reports emerged
regarding al...
Facts of the
CaseThe National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
initiated proceedings against CA Ramesh Pipalawa, Partner of M/s Shah &
Taparia and Engagement Partner for the statutory audit of seventeen branch...
Comprehensive Precautions to be
Taken by Chartered Accountants and CA FirmsLearning from Recent NFRA
Orders, ICAI Disciplinary Cases, and Regulatory ActionsThe recent disciplinary orders
passed by the National Financi...
Facts of the CaseThe National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
initiated an investigation into the professional conduct of CA Sanjay Soni,
Engagement Partner of M/s Lahoti Navneet & Co., who acted as the branch...
Facts of the Case:
The
assessee, Tulip Star Hotels Ltd., a Non-Banking Financial Company
(NBFC), placed fixed deposits with Citibank and extended guarantees for
loans to Fairmark, a company co-promote...
Facts of the CaseThe National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
conducted an investigation into the professional conduct of CA Ramesh
Chaturvedi, who acted as the Engagement Partner (EP) and signed the Independent
...
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Vipin Gupta received a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the
Income Tax Act for AY 1995-96 based on documents seized from Fena Ltd.
The
Assessing Officer (AO...
Facts of the CaseThe matter arose from NFRA's investigation into the
professional conduct of CA P Rabi Kumar Patra, Engagement Partner of M/s ABPS
& Associates, who conducted statutory branch audits of three branch...
Facts of the CaseDewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL), a
housing finance company listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay
Stock Exchange (BSE), was allegedly involved in large-scale financial
...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Union of India, challenged the
respondent Sanjay Kumar’s claim for a promotion under the applicable service
rules. The respondent had alleged non-compliance with prescribed promotion
...