Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,856,103
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III vs Govind Lal & Ved Prakash – Delhi High Court on Section 132(3) Search Proceedings and Income Tax Assessment Issues

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 303
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue, namely Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III, filed appeals against the respondents Govind Lal and Ved Prakash. The controversy originated from assessment proceedings con...

Commissioner of Income Tax-14 vs Anil Arora | Delhi High Court | Addition under Sections 69B, 69A, 23(4)(b), 142A & Search Assessment under Section 153A – DVO Valuation Cannot Replace Actual Purchase Consideration

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 252
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., in which the assessee, Mr. Anil Arora, was also covered. Consequent...

Director of Income Tax, Delhi vs M/s Lufthansa Cargo India | Delhi High Court on Aircraft Overhaul Payments as Fees for Technical Services under Sections 9(1)(vii), 195 & 201 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 306
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee was engaged in the business of wet-leasing aircraft and had acquired Boeing aircraft from foreign entities. The aircrafts were wet-leased primarily to Lufthansa Cargo AG, G...

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-I vs. Shri Suresh Nanda – Delhi High Court | Exclusion of Forced Stay Period for Determining Non-Resident Status under Section 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 342
Read More »
Facts of the Case Shri Suresh Nanda claimed Non-Resident Indian (NRI) status. During relevant periods, his passport had been seized/impounded by investigating authorities. The impounding of the passport was ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I vs Shri Suresh Nanda | Delhi High Court | Exclusion of Involuntary Stay in India for Determining Residential Status under Section 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 387
Read More »
Facts of the CaseShri Suresh Nanda had claimed the status of a non-resident for the relevant assessment years. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer determined that the assessee had stayed in India...

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-I vs Shri Suresh Nanda – Delhi High Court | Involuntary Stay in India Due to Passport Impounding Cannot Determine Residential Status under Section 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 343
Read More »
Facts of the Case Shri Suresh Nanda had consistently been assessed as a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) since 1985 and had business interests outside India, primarily in UAE. The assessee visited India on 28.0...

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs M/s Grup Ism Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on TDS Liability on Foreign Remittances, Fees for Technical Services (FTS), Section 9(1)(vii), Section 40(a)(i) & India-UAE DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 238
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring Assessment Year 2004–05, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had made payments aggregating to ₹94,31,826 to two UAE-based concerns: M/s CGS International, UAE – ₹56,54,963...

Anshika Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Apoorva Extrusion Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 – Delhi High Court on Withdrawal of Appeal and Right to Challenge Additions under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 166
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appellants, namely Anshika Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Apoorva Extrusion Pvt. Ltd., had filed appeals before the Delhi High Court. The dispute arose in relation to additions made during proc...

Saloni Narang vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-15 | Delhi High Court on Validity of Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) During Pendency of Quantum Appeals

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 196
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for initiation of penalty proceedings concerning ...

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs SMCC Construction India Ltd. – Delhi High Court on Depreciation on UPS/Inverters and Royalty for Technical Knowhow as Revenue Expenditure under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 206
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSMCC Construction India Limited had entered into a Technical Collaboration Agreement dated 10 December 1997 with Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co. Ltd. (SMCL), Japan. Under the agreement, SMCL acted as...