Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,856,108
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax-8 vs Sardar Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd. | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Imposed for Bona Fide Classification Dispute Between Capital and Revenue Receipt | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 213
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent assessee, Sardar Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., had leased property situated at A-33, Kailash Colony, New Delhi to the Ministry of Defence through a lease agreement dated 16 September 1985 for a...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-1), New Delhi vs Sudhir Sareen | Delhi High Court | NRE Income Addition Not Sustainable Where Assessee Stayed in India for Less Than 182 Days | AY 2003-04 to 2008-09

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 204
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred multiple appeals against the ITAT orders covering Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-09. Two issues had arisen before the Assessing Officer: Addition on account of N...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XI vs M/s DLF Commercial Project Corporation – Taxability of Advances Received Towards Development Rights and TDS Liability on Reimbursement Expenses under Sections 40(a)(ia), 143(2), 194C & 194J of the Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 248
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s DLF Commercial Project Corporation was engaged in land development activities for commercial, residential, retail, industrial parks, information technology parks and SEZ projects.For Assessment Ye...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XI vs M/s DLF Commercial Project Corporation – Delhi High Court on Taxability of Advances for Development Rights and TDS on Reimbursement Expenses under Sections 40(a)(ia) & 194C of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was engaged in the business of development of land and acquisition of development rights from land-owning companies.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that sub...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II & Commissioner of Income Tax vs JCB India Ltd. – Delhi High Court on Development Charges as Revenue Expenditure, Capital vs Revenue Expenditure and Rule of Consistency | AY 2007-08 & 2008-09

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 188
Read More »
Facts of the CaseJCB India Ltd. claimed development charges as revenue expenditure in its returns for AY 2007-08 and AY 2008-09. The Assessing Officer treated such expenditure as capital expenditure on the basis that ...

HCL Technologies Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Another – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Beyond Four Years Held Invalid in Absence of Failure to Disclose Material Facts | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 205
Read More »
Facts of the CaseHCL Technologies Limited claimed software licence fee expenditure amounting to approximately Rs. 31.69 crores as revenue expenditure for Assessment Year 2006–07. During the original assessment proc...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I vs Nageshwar Investment Ltd. | Section 153C of Income Tax Act – Interpretation of “Belongs To” for Hard Copy and Hard Disk Documents | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 204
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal passed a common order dated 28 November 2014 concerning Assessment Years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09. While deciding the appeals, the Tribunal relied upon t...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III vs PACL India Limited | Delhi High Court on Disallowance of Land Development Expenditure under Sections 143(3) & 260A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 201
Read More »
Facts of the CasePACL India Limited was engaged in the business of development and sale of agricultural land. The company purchased agricultural land, developed it through contractors, and thereafter sold it as develo...

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-21 vs Om Prakash Khaitan | Delhi High Court on Taxability of Client Advances Received by Lawyers and Disallowance under Section 14A of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 213
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Om Prakash Khaitan, proprietor of M/s O.P. Khaitan & Company, was engaged in legal practice as a solicitor and advocate and had consistently followed the cash system of accounting si...

Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust vs Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) – Delhi High Court | Exemption under Sections 11, 12 & 12A for Charitable Trust Running Integrated Ayurvedic and Allopathic Hospital

Author
My Tax Expert
21/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 203
Read More »
Facts of the Case Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust was created under a Will executed by Late Lala Khairati Ram. The principal objects of the trust included: Promotion and teaching of Sanskrit; Improvemen...