Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu vs M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – J&K and Ladakh High Court Dismisses Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by 23 May 2022 Judgment in CEA No. 10/2020 and Connected Appeals
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K
Jammu, filed CEA No. 262/2022 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and
Ladakh at Jammu against M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., IGC S...
Adonex Pharmaceutical Private Limited vs State of Bihar — GST Registration Restoration Application to Be Decided on Merits Without Limitation Bar Under Section 29 of GST Act
Facts of the
CaseAdonex Pharmaceutical Private Limited approached
the Patna High Court challenging the order-in-appeal dated 08.09.2022 passed in
Appeal No. ARN-AD100822004755G by the Additional Commissioner of State ...
M/s. Bikram Enterprises vs Additional Commissioner (Appeals), CGST, CX & Customs, Bhubaneswar & Another — Delay under Proviso to Rule 23 of CGST Rules Condoned; GST Portal Directed to Be Opened for Filing Return Subject to Payment of Tax, Interest, Late Fee and Penalty
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Bikram Enterprises approached the High Court
of Orissa in W.P.(C) No. 25343 of 2022. The matter concerned delay on the part
of the Petitioner in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Central Goo...
M/s. Capital Enterprisers vs Union of India & Others: Orissa High Court Disposes TRAN-1/TRAN-2 Writ Petition as Not Pressed in View of Filco Trade Centre Relief and Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Capital Enterprisers filed W.P.(C) No. 34629
of 2020 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack seeking reliefs in relation
to the transitional credit mechanism under GST.During the hearing, lear...
Indo Electricals vs Deputy Commissioner — GST Assessment Order Quashed for Failure to Grant Personal Hearing and Improper Service of Hearing Notice
Facts of the
Case
Indo Electricals, the petitioner, approached the Kerala High Court
challenging the assessment order marked as Ext.P6 for the assessment year
2017–2018 under the State Goods and Services...
Sampath Singh vs Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal-II & Ors. – Kerala High Court Directs Registration of Section 17 SARFAESI Application; CJM Order Appointing Advocate Commissioner Not Mandatory Where Bona Fide Tenant Challenges Only Physical Possession
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court of Kerala
after being aggrieved by the failure of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II,
Ernakulam, to number and take up his Securitisation Application filed under
...
Union of India, Ministry of Mines & Anr. vs Syed Ashfaq Ahmed & Ors. – Telangana High Court: Compassionate Appointment Cannot Be Directed After Long Efflux of Time | Article 226 of the Constitution of India & Section 151 CPC
Facts of the
CaseThe dispute concerned a claim for compassionate
appointment by the first respondent, Syed Ashfaq Ahmed. His father had died
on 07.07.2003. Since his case was not considered for appointment on
compass...
Mohammed Abdul Umair vs State of Telangana & Connected Matters – Telangana High Court Restrains Police Interference with Lawful Tobacco Business During Operation of Supreme Court Interim Orders | Article 226, COTPA 2003 & Section 151 CPC
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners were proprietors carrying on
tobacco-product businesses under their respective trade concerns, namely Royal
Agencies, Adeeb Traders Kaghaznagar, and Suresh Traders. They
asserted that...
Beni Madhaw Jha & Hema Jha vs State of Jharkhand & Prem Prakash Gangesaria – Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Sections 406, 420, 467, 506/34 IPC Case Involving Development Agreement, Outstanding Dues and GST Amount Dispute
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Beni Madhaw Jha and Hema Jha,
approached the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi apprehending arrest in
connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 193 of 2022, arising from Complaint
Petiti...
Vinay Pratap Singh vs State of Haryana and Another – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Investigation Against Public Servants Cannot Be Ordered Mechanically Without Required Sanction Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act
Facts of the
CaseThe High Court dealt with four connected petitions
challenging the order dated 3 July 2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge,
Gurugram, in exercise of powers under Section 156(3) of the Code of Cri...