Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Gayatri Ventures vs State of Chhattisgarh – Reimbursement of Additional GST Liability Due to GST Rate Increase under Amended Contract Clause 2.17.1 | Chhattisgarh High Court | Writ Petition (T) No. 282 of 2022
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Gayatri Ventures, was awarded a work
contract by the Water Resources Department of the State of Chhattisgarh through
a work order dated 06.05.2022. At the time of issuance of the work o...
GG Associates vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others – Reimbursement of Additional GST Liability Due to Increase in GST Rate under Amended Contract Clause 2.17.1 | Chhattisgarh High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, GG Associates, was awarded a
government contract by the Water Resources Department of the State of
Chhattisgarh. At the time the work order was issued, GST on the contract was
payable ...
Acambis Helpline Management Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others – Cancellation of GST Registration Set Aside for Non-Speaking Order under Section 29 read with Section 39 of the CGST Act | Allahabad High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Acambis Helpline Management Pvt. Ltd.,
was engaged in the business of manpower supply and was duly registered under
the GST laws. The GST Department issued a show cause notice dated 02....
Rajinder Singh @ Lovely & Connected Matters vs State of Punjab – Regular Bail Granted in GST Evasion, Bogus ITC & Corruption Case under Sections 7, 7A & 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201 & 120-B IPC
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Rajinder Singh @ Lovely, Avtar
Singh, Pawan Kumar Sharma @ Kala Pandit, Sachin Kumar, Randhir Singh, Balwinder
Singh, and Ajay Kumar, filed separate petitions seeking regular ba...
Rajiv Dutta vs State of Punjab | Anticipatory Bail Granted in GST Tax Evasion Scam on Parity Principle under Section 438 CrPC and Prevention of Corruption Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Rajiv Dutta, Kunal Verma and
Charanjeet Singh Ghataure, filed petitions under Section 438 CrPC seeking
anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 8 dated 21.08.2020 registered...
Sant Kumar & Another vs State of Haryana – Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail in Alleged Fake ITC Fraud Case under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 201 | Economic Offences and Bail Principles
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners sought regular bail under Section 439
Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467,
468, 471, 120-B and 201 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petition...
Prameela L. vs State of Kerala & Ors. – Kerala High Court Upholds Rejection of Legal Heirship Certificate to Adopted Daughter Without Valid Adoption under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 | Compassionate Appointment Case
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Prameela L., claimed to be the
adopted daughter of late K. Gopalan, who allegedly took her into his
care after the death of her biological parents and brought her up as his own
daughte...
Brilltech Engineers Private Limited vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited – Delhi High Court Holds Section 21 Notice Requirement Satisfied and Appoints Arbitrator under Sections 9 & 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Facts of the CaseArmy Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) awarded a
construction contract to Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited for a
residential project at Greater Noida. The respondent subsequently awarde...
Rajinder Singh @ Lovely & Others vs State of Punjab – Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail in GST Bogus ITC and Corruption Case | Sections 7, 7A & 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201 & 120-B IPC
Facts of the CaseThe petitions were filed seeking regular bail in connection
with an FIR registered by the Vigilance Bureau, Punjab, alleging a large-scale
GST evasion racket operating in the State. According to the pr...
M/s. New Khadi Niketan vs State of Odisha represented through Commissioner of Sales Tax – Whether Saree, Patta, Dhoti & Gamuchha are Taxable as Textile Products under Entry No. 3 Part-II of the Odisha Entry Tax Act, 1999 | Section 19 of the Odisha Entry Tax Act, 1999
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. New Khadi Niketan, challenged
the order of the Odisha Sales Tax Tribunal before the High Court of Orissa
under Section 19 of the Odisha Entry Tax Act, 1999. The dispute arose
from...