Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Sunil Verma vs State of U.P. – Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Case under Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 and 414 IPC; GST Bills Relied Upon to Explain Jewellery Purchases
Facts of the
CaseThe applicant, Sunil Verma, filed a bail
application seeking release in Case Crime No. 184 of 2022 registered under
Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 and 414 IPC at Police Station Phephna, District
Ballia....
M/s LMJ Services Ltd. vs Union of India & Others: GST Transitional Credit Under Section 140—TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 Filing/Revisional Opportunity Extended to All Aggrieved Registered Assessees; Rajasthan High Court Disposes Writ Petition Following Supreme Court Directions
Facts of the
CaseM/s LMJ Services Ltd., Jodhpur, filed a writ
petition before the Rajasthan High Court concerning its grievance relating to GST
transitional credit and the facility for filing the relevant TRAN-1 and
...
M/s Ajmer Diesels and Tractors vs Union of India & Others: GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 Transitional Credit Relief Governed by Supreme Court Directions; Rajasthan High Court Disposes Writ Petition After Portal Reopening and Extension up to 30 November 2022
Facts of the
CaseM/s Ajmer Diesels and Tractors filed a writ
petition before the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur concerning its grievance
relating to GST transitional credit and the facility for filing or
revising th...
A.J. Augustine vs State of Kerala & Others: Section 143(3) of Negotiable Instruments Act Mandates Expeditious Trial of Section 138 Cheque Dishonour Cases; Kerala High Court Directs Disposal Within Three Months
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, A.J. Augustine, aged 85
years and proprietor of Kerala Trading Company, Nedumkandam, approached the
Kerala High Court by filing three Original Petitions under Article 227 of
the Const...
Binod Kumar Saw @ Binod Saw vs State of Bihar – Patna High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Section 7 Essential Commodities Act Case Involving Alleged Recovery of Subsidized Wheat and Rice
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Binod Kumar Saw @ Binod Saw,
apprehended arrest in connection with a criminal case registered for an offence
punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.According to th...
Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs NTPC — Section 11(6) & Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 | Invalid Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Procedure Is Severable and Does Not Void Arbitration Agreement: Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseRam Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd., the
petitioner, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator for
adjudication of dispu...
Satpal vs State of Haryana: Regular Bail Granted in Alleged Fake GST Firm and Cheating Case Under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B & 201 IPC; Section 132 GST Act Deleted
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Satpal, approached the Punjab and
Haryana High Court seeking regular bail in FIR No. 345 dated 22.10.2020. The
FIR was registered under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 468 and 471 of the
...
Mr. Udayasankar & Ms. Vasanthi vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise: Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions as Withdrawn in Section 41 and 41A CrPC Custody Protection Matter
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Mr. Udayasankar in W.P.(MD)
No. 8898 of 2021 and Ms. Vasanthi in W.P.(MD) No. 8899 of 2021,
approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court by filing writ petitions
under Artic...
M/s Bhanjadeo Constructions vs State of Odisha & Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts: Orissa High Court Directs Consideration Under Revised Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018 and Grants Protection from Coercive Action
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s Bhanjadeo Constructions,
approached the High Court challenging the action of the State authorities in
not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the change in the tax...
Commissioner CGST and Central Excise (J&K), Jammu vs Zuventus Healthcare Ltd – Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1994: High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund Following SRD Nutrients and Coordinate Bench Ruling
Facts of the
CaseThe Commissioner CGST and Central Excise (J&K),
Jammu filed an appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central
Excise Act, 1994 against an order involving the respondent, Zuventus
H...