Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Shiba Prasad Panda vs The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Division, Keonjhar and Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement in Pre-GST Works Contracts | Revised Odisha Guidelines dated 10.12.2018
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner challenged the action of the
Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from
the transition from the Value Added Tax regime to the Goods and Services Tax
r...
State of Karnataka & Ors. vs INM Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Section 140 CGST Act, 2017 – Transitional CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 – Technical Glitch and Non-Reflection in Electronic Credit Ledger – Karnataka High Court Upholds Relief in View of FILCO Trade Centre
Facts of the
CaseINM Technologies Pvt. Ltd., respondent No. 2, was a
registered dealer under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and had
been allotted GSTIN 29AADC17257B1ZK for its business of manufacture and...
M/s. Shree Steels vs Superintendent, GST & Central Excise, Cuttack Division-II & Others – Writ Petition Disposed of as Infructuous Due to Subsequent Development
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Shree Steels instituted W.P.(C) No. 5423 of
2022 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack against the Superintendent, GST
& Central Excise, Cuttack Division-II and other opposite parties. W...
Hemanta Kumar Kisan vs The CT & GST Officer, Jharsuguda Circle & Another – Appeal Under Section 107 of the Odisha GST Act Permitted Using Temporary GSTIN Where Registered Dealer Was Treated as Unregistered
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Hemanta Kumar Kisan, was a
registered dealer. His grievance arose from an order dated 9 September 2021
passed by the CT & GST Officer, Jharsuguda Circle, Jharsuguda, which
proceed...
K. Rajan vs. State Tax Officer & Others: Kerala High Court Grants Interim Protection from Tax Recovery Pending Delay Condonation and Stay Applications Before the KVAT Appellate Tribunal under Section 55/60 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, K. Rajan, is the proprietor of M/s. Dhanya Saw Mills based in
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.
The
petitioner was aggrieved by an assessment order (Exhibit P1) issued b...
Shiba Prasad Panda vs The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Division, Keonjhar and Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts | Revised Odisha Finance Department Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner filed the writ petition challenging
the action of the Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax
amount arising from the change in the indirect tax regime from Value Added...
Charan Singh vs State of Haryana and Another – Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail in Alleged Fake GST Firm and Paper Transaction Fraud under Section 132(1)(B) & 132(1)(C) of the HGST Act, 2017 and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner sought regular bail in connection
with FIR No. 8 dated 05.01.2019, registered at Police Station Kanina, District
Mahendergarh, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and Sectio...
Shiba Prasad Panda vs The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Division, Keonjhar and Others – Orissa High Court Directs Consideration of GST Differential Tax Reimbursement for Pre-GST Works Contracts Under Revised Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner challenged the action of the
Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from
the change in the tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Services
...
M/s RD Construction and General Traders vs Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha and Another – Orissa High Court Permits Statutory Appeal with Condonation of Delay Due to Pendency of Writ Petition
Facts of the
CaseM/s RD Construction and General Traders filed a
writ petition before the Orissa High Court challenging an impugned order passed
against it. During consideration of the writ petition, the issue arose
...
Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. | Principle of Natural Justice Violated: High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Order Due to Non-Service of Notice Under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 Read With Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 As Notice Was Neither Served Nor Uploaded on GSTN Portal
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner's Profile: Petitioner No. 1, M/s Adisan
Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in business
operations, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder an...