Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Nikhal Gupta & Sanjay Gupta vs Union of India – Interim Bail Granted in GST Prosecution for Daughter's Marriage | Sections 132(1)(a), (b), (c) & (d) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 439 CrPC | Rajasthan High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Nikhal Gupta and Sanjay
Gupta (son and father), were arrested in connection with proceedings
initiated by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) for offences
punishable un...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Wipro Limited – Karnataka High Court | Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Inclusion of VAT/GST in Export Turnover for Section 10A Deduction
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the Karnataka High Court against the
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2011-1...
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu vs UFLEX Ltd. – Jammu & Kashmir High Court Dismisses Department's Excise Appeal Following Earlier Judgment | CEA No. 301/2022
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST & Central
Excise, Jammu preferred an appeal before the High Court against UFLEX Ltd. The
Department challenged the order passed in favour of the respondent under the...
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu vs Coromandel International Ltd. – CEA No. 300/2022 | Jammu & Kashmir High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Following Earlier Binding Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise,
Jammu filed an appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
against Coromandel International Ltd. The Revenue sought to challenge
...
M/s Malika Veetil Agencies vs Joint Commissioner & Others – GST Transitional Credit Through TRAN-1/TRAN-2 Governed by Supreme Court Ruling in Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.; Kerala High Court Applies Portal Reopening and Verification Directions
Facts of the
CaseM/s Malika Veetil Agencies, represented by its
proprietor, approached the Kerala High Court in a writ petition concerning the
issue of availing Transitional Credit while migrating to the Goods and
Se...
Potta Suresh vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Another – FIR Under Sections 41 and 102 Cr.P.C. for Possession of Tobacco Products Quashed; FIR Must Disclose Commission of an Offence and Seized Stock Ordered to Be Returned
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Potta Suresh, filed the Criminal
Petition seeking quashing of F.I.R. No. 212 of 2022 dated 21 August 2022,
registered at Ramabhadrapuram Police Station, Vizianagaram District.The FIR w...
M/s Malika Veetil Agencies vs Joint Commissioner & Others – GST Transitional Credit Through TRAN-1/TRAN-2 Governed by Supreme Court Ruling in Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.; Kerala High Court Applies Portal Reopening and Verification Directions
Facts of the
CaseM/s Malika Veetil Agencies, represented by its
proprietor, approached the Kerala High Court in a writ petition concerning the
issue of availing Transitional Credit while migrating to the Goods and
Se...
Chemmanur Fashion Jewellers vs Union of India & Cochin Port Trust – Licence Fee Liability, Tender Allotment Termination and Disputed Delay Requiring Evidence; Kerala High Court Reserves Appropriate Remedies
Facts of the
CaseChemmanur Fashion Jewellers was the successful
bidder in a tender-cum-auction conducted by the Cochin Port Trust for allotment
of a Tourist Jetty with allied structures and nearby open area at Willing...
P. Shyam Raju vs Kerala Minerals and Metals Ltd. – Kerala High Court Upholds Tender Disqualification for Belated Solvency Certificate; Tender Conditions Cannot Be Altered Unless Per Se Illegal
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant, P. Shyam Raju, proprietor of Skilderz
Developers, participated in a tender floated by Kerala Minerals and Metals
Limited for work similar to an ongoing work already being executed by hi...
Mohammed Nazar vs Assistant Commissioner–Intelligence, State GST Department – Kerala High Court Grants Recovery Protection on 20% Payment Where GST Appellate Tribunal Was Not Constituted | Sections 63 and 122 of CGST/SGST Acts
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Mohammed Nazar, approached the
Kerala High Court being aggrieved by proceedings completed against him for the assessment
year 2018-19.The petitioner’s grievance was that the proceedi...